Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies.
Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.
And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize
It`s going to be hard to get you all home :) |
It`s not the Pokemon tagline Gotta Catch `Em All :) |
How are we going to escape from them? :) |
Released in January 1961, One Houndred and One Dalmatians (which
happens to be it`s original title, despite how it`s numeral title has
also been used) was the very first feature that was released that decade. Directed by veteran directors at the time Clyde Geronimi, Hamilton Luske, and Wolfgang Reitherman. But it happened to be among Disney`s most influential pictures.
It`s one of the most beloved and was the highest grossing movie of 1961. But it was also an innovative picture at
the same time. It was stylistically and tone-wise a departure from what
Disney had done. Yet what was innovative about it, was it`s technical
advances and the invention of the Xerox process. While the techical
innovation wasn`t just a good thing, there`s no change that Dalmatians
had an distinctive look that pretty much defined the upcoming Disney
features. And changed the look for the usual Disney fare. Coming off the
heels of the highly ambitious, yet underperforming Sleeping Beauty, Dalmatians pulled the studio out of the financial slump caused by it. Yet Dalmatians was essentially a departure from Beauty in terms of it`s sheer perfection and was a lighter movie for the Disney crew to work on.
The Visuals
I thought the clock was a human :) |
Before 1961, it would have been impossible to animate one spotted dog, let alone 101. Yet Xerox didn`t only made it possible, but made the animation devoided of sharp lines. Xerox was first used in the Dragon sequence as a test on Beauty and the Goliath II short). What Xerox actually did, was to transfer the animators drawings directly into cels and eliminating the inking process.
Well, in Wonderland you would`ve been able to do what I`m doing ;) |
This is actually going to be shown at our Wedding speech. But hey, it was Pongo`s fault :) |
It was a look that Walt certainly hated (much to the surprise of the staff, which may be one reason for why it wasn`t one of his favorites. Though the liked the movie later on). Still, for Dalmatians it makes
good fit for it`s rugged London setting. Yet
the animators acutally loved the style, for allowing more of their work
shine (which was also why the animators were urged to draw well all the
time). One problem with
Xerox that it wasn`t a truly delineation between the lines of the backgrounds and
characters. Yet it was an innovation that saved a lot of time and
money.
The
technique was perfect for a film which dozens of spotted dogs
appeared on screen at once. The animators could draw a small group
of dogs, and the camera could repeat the group to fill the scene. And yes, Dalmatians does feature a lot of recycled animation (which would become recurring habbit for the following Disney features to come). It was Ken Anderson who proposed Xerox. And Walt didn`t forgive Anderson for it until the very end. And sure, the design of the humans does
resemble the ones from Beauty. Anita looks like she could`ve been a distant cousin
of Princess Aurora (and also had her live action model, Helene Stanley). Whereas Nanny looks like a distant cousin from the Goodfairies (which one of their voice actresses, Barbara Luddy, did the live referencing for).
Time Setting & Parenthood
Yes, we`re glued together :) |
At least it`s not Zorro that we`re watching ;) |
was actually set in the present time. While it certainly wasn`t the very first Disney feature to do (Dumbo was), it was certain more evident in Dalmatians. By showing the characters watching television and having contemporary components that made the film more current. While such a approach could always risk to date the film, at least it`s something that distinguishes Dalmatians.
Another thing that differentiates Dalmatians is a rare feature which features about the protagonsits` parenthood. Which is truly something that is
rarely seen in Disney. When parenthood usually happens with lead characters in Disney, it`s often at the end of
the movies (The Lion King, Bambi and Lady & The Tramp). Whereas Dalmatians is essentially about the leads reproducing in the beginning of the story. Another film that would follow that pattern would be the following The Aristocats, who would heavily borrow components from Dalmatians. But hey, Dalmatians did precede it almost a decade, so there`s nothing wrong about Aristocats borrowing from it.
Music
Well, I`m a pup, so I must read human letters closely :) |
Yeah, since those dogs are framed in the picture, I can smoke on them :) |
It`s a gathering of both dalmatians and labradors :) |
The Second Disney Animated Feature Starring Canines
We`re desperate to be bought, that`s why we couldn`t care less if we look sullen :) |
And sure, as aforementioned, Dalmatians
is instantly comparable to
Lady & The Tramp, for starring canines. While Dalmatians never becomes a carbon
copy of Tramp, they still have many components in common. Just like Tramp, Dalmatians is executed from the dogs point of view. But here in a more clever and meta way. Both films even ends with a Christmas scene. And yes, as well known,
characters from Tramp makes an cameo in a clever scene, (which is the original Jock cleanup from Tramp)
I don`t want you to slide :) Nuff said :) |
Yet Dalmatians plays
various nods to Walt`s predecessors in many
ways: The scene where Seargant Tibs (who for some reason was my favorite character as a child) sneaks in the window, is a nod to the same scene which Figaro does the same in Pinocchio. And the scenes in the ice and the snowstorm does recall Bambi.
ways: The scene where Seargant Tibs (who for some reason was my favorite character as a child) sneaks in the window, is a nod to the same scene which Figaro does the same in Pinocchio. And the scenes in the ice and the snowstorm does recall Bambi.
Narration & Setting
What makes also makes Dalmatians distinctive is how the film makes Pongo (voiced by Aussie actor Rod Taylor) the narrator. At least for a while. The way of giving him the narration gives many possibilites for meta. But Dalmatians is truly the first film where the lead character gets to narrate and not relying on an outside narrator or a sidekick (like Jiminy Cricket in Pinocchio).
This was made to make it impossible to count us :) |
Yes, it`s dog cookies, not for humans :) |
It`s also remarkable how Dalmatians is the third film that it`s set in England (the first being Alice in Wonderland and the following Peter Pan).
And just like both of them, it`s based on a childrens story. But
regarding that, it`s noteworthy how some characters are given English
accents, while others are striktly American. It`s truly
something that would make purists whine. But hey, sometimes animation
does allow for such anachronism.
Genre
I`m trying to act like Mona Lisa in Scream :) |
Another departure with Dalmatians is pretty much it's genre. It`s
pretty much a blend of both a comedy and a thriller. While Walt`s earliest films tried to be essentially a variety of different tones and genres, there was a certain decrease of the darkness during the 50`s (with the exception of Sleeping Beauty).
pretty much a blend of both a comedy and a thriller. While Walt`s earliest films tried to be essentially a variety of different tones and genres, there was a certain decrease of the darkness during the 50`s (with the exception of Sleeping Beauty).
We made everything white, due to us being dalmatians :) |
Dalmatians
is essentially light and frivolous in tone and frankly derpived of gravity. Which is something that the film has been cherished for. Even
the opening titles are incredibly cartoony and literal.
Yet when the plot truly strikes, the film allows itself to be a
thriller. Sure there were suspensful
elements in Walt`s previous films. But there was more to Dalmatians than there`s been to his other films.
The Villains
I`m glad you won`t be upon me forever :) |
While Cruella may not be my personal favorite Disney villain, she`s still effective enough to be memorable. But a remarkable thing about her is
how she manages to be both comical and scary at the same time (which she successfully manages to be both). And yes, her two hair colors was actually from the book (and interpreted by Disney historians
for showing her two trademarks). Though Davis also looked on hairdos from 1940 to the 60`s on magazines. Mary Wickes (Laverne in The Hunchback of Notre Dame) did the live action reference for Cruella. Davis was hesitant of pushing her design too much. But Milt
Kahl (who wasn`t easy to impress) thought that she stole the show. Her coat was exaggerated to match her oversized personality. And her lining was red due to "a devil image". Gerson auditioned in front of Marc Davis. And landed on a
"phony theatrical voice", someone who's set sail from New York but
hasn't quite reached England".
Davis claimed that Gerson`sI`m just pretending to like dogs: ) For the sake of marketing :) |
As for
Cruella`s two henchmen, Horace and Jasper, they may be too typical of their
kinds and therefore too traditional. And while they`re not as
memorable as their female boss, they`re still effective enough in their parts. Both The Colonel and Jasper were voiced by the same actor, being J. Pat O'Malley (who would voice Coronel Hathi in The Jungle Book). Horace was voiced by Frederick Worlock. And both of them was animated by John Loundsbery, Art Stevens and Eric Cleworth.
The Plot & Comparisons To The Original Novel
Well, at least I`m trying to give my best shot :) Forgive me for being scrawny :) |
This is my equivalent of a magic wand :) To make a labrador white :) |
Behind the Scenes Information
Dodie Smith published The Hundred and One Dalmatians in 1956, just five years prior to Disney`s version. Smith had nine dalmatians of her own, one of them called Pongo. The
birth of puppies actually happened to Smith. Her dalmatians had 15
puppies, one was born lifeless and her husband revived it. However, they
sold most of them, and kept only a few. And yes, a friend of hers said (in a non-malicious manner) that the dogs would made a good coat.
Walt read the novel in 1957 and promptly obtained the rights. And funny enough, Smith hoped that Disney would make her story into a film. Smith`s novel enjoyed a big popularity in the UK. And Dalmatians was originally scheduled for a Christmas 1960 release. Walt even sent Smith some sketches during pre-production. Smith herself saw Dalmatians at a private screening
and responded to Walt swiftly (though she complained about her name
being small on a credit and Walt sent her some originals from the
picture as a compensation).
It`s well known that 101 Dalmatians was written by one single man alone. Bill Peet was the very first to actually write a screenplay. He came at Disney in 1937 as an in-betweener. But worked himself up at the story. And Smith herself wrote to Peet that he had improved on her book, as with the designs than the illustrations in the book. Peet was charged with the recordings as well. Walt was always present at story meetings, regardless of his minor interest in animation. And believe it or not, when Peet was with his friend on a camera store, Walt called the store for Peet.
Yet regarding all black spots in the movie, frame-by-frame, the total was 6,469,952. The dogs aren't actually white. They're very light grey. White would have been too bright on screen, and wouldn't have worked well in the snowy scenes. The process of making the picture went very fast. Clarence Nash (the voice of Donald Duck) did the dog barks. Lisa
Daniels only provided about a third of Perdita's voicework in the film.
Halfway through the movie's production, she got married and
moved to New York City so Cate Bauer completed the vocal performance.
101 Dalmatians took three years to make and costed $ 4 Million dollars to make. During its first theatrical run, the film grossed $14 million in the United States and Canada. At
the time, it was the biggest grossing
animated film of all time. It was re-released theatrically in 1969, 1979, 1985, and 1991 (which was a surprise hit of that summer), grossing $41.8 million in its first 24 days, It was the first animated feature to gross over $10 million on initial release. The film since grossed well over $200 million Worldwide. And yes, Dalmatians also appealed to a dating crowd.
Franchise/Spinoff-Properties
Regarding
Dalmatians popularity, it`s redundant to scrutinize why it became a franchise, nonetheless. But regardless of being connected to Walt`s classic, it became a franchise on it`s own
terms. Dalmatians happened to be one of the very first Disney
properties to actually receive a live action treatment.
And that was
long before the live action-remake became an official trend. Having
already written about this live action treatment, I will try not to
repeat myself too much. Other than the remake was released 35 years
later and was a hit. It starred Glenn Close as Cruella, who made an
inspired performance. Jeff
Daniels starred as Roger. And the structure of the movie was influenced by Home Alone. However, Dalmatians received a
sequel that was only made for cashgrab. In May 2021, there was a prequel of Cruella released (with Emma Stone).
As
for the other spinoff-properties, the live action remake received an
animated series spinoff. Released in the fall of 1997, Disney produced 52 episodes of the series. Being the first partnership between Disney and Kellogg's. It was an enjoyable spinoff
which was in the style of Walt`s classic. A direct-to-video
cheapquel was also made during the cheapquel phase (101 Dalmatians II Patch`s Adventure). However, Dalmatians been given another
spinoff in 101 Dalmatians Street, which takes place 60 years after Walt`s classic. Released in 2019, it was made for Disney Plus. Despite how it premeired on Disney Channel first.
Epilogue
Yes, even dalmatians can have pyjamas :) |
Yes, I`m promoting smoking, since it makes me so happy :) |
We`re trying to stare like humans :) |
Bark on my updates on https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100035703494050 and https://twitter.com/NerdyLunada.
References:
101 Dalmatians Diamond Edition
Mouse Under Glass (David Koenig).
The Art of Walt Disney: From Mickey Mouse to the Magic Kingdoms and Beyond (2011 edition, Christopher Finch and John Lasseter).
Disney's Art of Animation: From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas)
Excellent review! I'm amazed at how much content you are able to pack in one article.
SvarSlettGood point that we haven't seen a Disney movie with naturalistic animals in a while. I guess the last one was Bolt.
Not only was Dalmatians the highest grossing movie of 1961, it's also still the second highest grossing Disney animated movie of all time, after Snow White, if you account for inflation.
Even though I prefer the visual style of Sleeping Beauty, I think the visuals for Dalmatians are very distinctive and I'm glad we got the movie the way it looks even if Walt didn't approve at first and it took a while for him to warm up to it. I know he ended up liking the movie enough that he wanted to adapt another one of Dodie Smith's novels.
Although Dumbo was the first contemporary Disney feature, I guess it feels timeless enough with the circus setting that you don't really notice it's set in the 40s unlike Dalmatians with the 60s. It seems like there was one movie every decade after this which was firmly set in its decade. The Rescuers in the 70s, Oliver & Company in the 80s, The Rescuers Down Under in the 90s, and Lilo & Stitch in the 2000s. Also good point that this is the first time the characters don't just become parents at the very end. I also didn't realize, until you pointed it out, that Dalmatians is the first time the lead is a narrator and not a sidekick or omnipresent narrator (like in Cinderella).
I really like the original version of Cruella that talks about her origin and coming from a graveyard. It's very catchy. That's interesting though that the Sherman Brothers wrote a song for the opening (much like their Aristocats opening song) but it never made it into the film, wish I knew what it sounded like. Could you explain why you think the opening titles are anachronistic?
Tibbs is still one of my favorite characters from this movie after Lucky (the dalmatian puppy obsessed with TV). Like you, this movie did not rock my world growing up, especially since I was more familiar with the two live-action movies which were regularly airing on the Disney Channel but I have a much higher opinion of it now.
Hi there! :) Thanks for your kind words :) But remember that my entries aren`t meant to be reviews ;) Just analyses. Sorry for nitpicking. What I mean about the anachronism of the opening titles, is how they are more literal to what`s happening on the screen and less serious. Right? Otherwise, I agree with your points :) Thanks :)
SlettYou're right, your blog posts aren't really reviews as much as a comprehensive history but you do somewhat review the movie by explaining what you liked/disliked as a child and how those views changed when you rewatch as an adult. I understand what you're saying about the opening titles but I'm not sure I would describe that as anachronistic. Anachronistic usually means out of time, like featuring cell phones in Rococo France or George Washington in the Medieval Era. I also don't think I find the opening titles to be tonally at odds with the rest of the movie.
SvarSlett