Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies.
Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.
And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize
![]() |
It`s going to be hard to get you all home :) |
![]() |
It`s not the Pokemon tagline Gotta Catch `Em All :) |

![]() |
How are we going to escape from them? :) |
Released in January 1961,
One Houndred and One Dalmatians (which
happens to be it`s original title, despite how it`s numeral title has
also been used) was the very first feature that was released that decade. Directed by veteran directors at the time Clyde Geronimi, Hamilton Luske, and Wolfgang Reitherman. But it happened to be among Disney`s most influential pictures.
It`s one of the most beloved and was the highest grossing movie of 1961. But it was also an innovative picture at
the same time. It was stylistically and tone-wise a departure from what
Disney had done. Yet what was innovative about it, was it`s technical
advances and the invention of the Xerox process. While the techical
innovation wasn`t just a good thing, there`s no change that Dalmatians
had an distinctive look that pretty much defined the upcoming Disney
features. And changed the look for the usual Disney fare. Coming off the
heels of the highly ambitious, yet underperforming Sleeping Beauty, Dalmatians pulled the studio out of the financial slump caused by it. Yet Dalmatians was essentially a departure from Beauty in terms of it`s sheer perfection and was a lighter movie for the Disney crew to work on.

The Visuals
![]() |
I thought the clock was a human :) |


![]() |
Well, in Wonderland you would`ve been able to do what I`m doing ;) |
![]() |
This is actually going to be shown at our Wedding speech. But hey, it was Pongo`s fault :) |
It was a look that Walt certainly hated (much to the surprise of the staff, which may be one reason for why it wasn`t one of his favorites. Though the liked the movie later on). Still, for Dalmatians it makes
good fit for it`s rugged London setting. Yet
the animators acutally loved the style, for allowing more of their work
shine (which was also why the animators were urged to draw well all the
time). One problem with
Xerox that it wasn`t a truly delineation between the lines of the backgrounds and
characters. Yet it was an innovation that saved a lot of time and
money.

Time Setting & Parenthood
![]() |
Yes, we`re glued together :) |
![]() |
At least it`s not Zorro that we`re watching ;) |
was actually set in the present time. While it certainly wasn`t the very first Disney feature to do (Dumbo was), it was certain more evident in Dalmatians. By showing the characters watching television and having contemporary components that made the film more current. While such a approach could always risk to date the film, at least it`s something that distinguishes Dalmatians.

Music

![]() |
Well, I`m a pup, so I must read human letters closely :) |
![]() |
Yeah, since those dogs are framed in the picture, I can smoke on them :) |

![]() |
It`s a gathering of both dalmatians and labradors :) |

The Second Disney Animated Feature Starring Canines
![]() |
We`re desperate to be bought, that`s why we couldn`t care less if we look sullen :) |

![]() |
I don`t want you to slide :) Nuff said :) |

ways: The scene where Seargant Tibs (who for some reason was my favorite character as a child) sneaks in the window, is a nod to the same scene which Figaro does the same in Pinocchio. And the scenes in the ice and the snowstorm does recall Bambi.
Narration & Setting
What makes also makes

![]() |
This was made to make it impossible to count us :) |
![]() |
Yes, it`s dog cookies, not for humans :) |
It`s also remarkable how Dalmatians is the third film that it`s set in England (the first being Alice in Wonderland and the following Peter Pan).
And just like both of them, it`s based on a childrens story. But
regarding that, it`s noteworthy how some characters are given English
accents, while others are striktly American. It`s truly
something that would make purists whine. But hey, sometimes animation
does allow for such anachronism.
Genre
![]() |
I`m trying to act like Mona Lisa in Scream :) |

pretty much a blend of both a comedy and a thriller. While Walt`s earliest films tried to be essentially a variety of different tones and genres, there was a certain decrease of the darkness during the 50`s (with the exception of Sleeping Beauty).
![]() |
We made everything white, due to us being dalmatians :) |

The Villains
![]() |
I`m glad you won`t be upon me forever :) |



![]() |
I`m just pretending to like dogs: ) For the sake of marketing :) |

The Plot & Comparisons To The Original Novel
![]() |
Well, at least I`m trying to give my best shot :) Forgive me for being scrawny :) |
![]() |
This is my equivalent of a magic wand :) To make a labrador white :) |

Behind the Scenes Information




It`s well known that 101 Dalmatians was written by one single man alone. Bill Peet was the very first to actually write a screenplay. He came at Disney in 1937 as an in-betweener. But worked himself up at the story. And Smith herself wrote to Peet that he had improved on her book, as with the designs than the illustrations in the book. Peet was charged with the recordings as well. Walt was always present at story meetings, regardless of his minor interest in animation. And believe it or not, when Peet was with his friend on a camera store, Walt called the store for Peet.
![]() |

Yet regarding all black spots in the movie, frame-by-frame, the total was 6,469,952. The dogs aren't actually white. They're very light grey. White would have been too bright on screen, and wouldn't have worked well in the snowy scenes. The process of making the picture went very fast. Clarence Nash (the voice of Donald Duck) did the dog barks. Lisa
Daniels only provided about a third of Perdita's voicework in the film.
Halfway through the movie's production, she got married and
moved to New York City so Cate Bauer completed the vocal performance.
101 Dalmatians took three years to make and costed $ 4 Million dollars to make. During its first theatrical run, the film grossed $14 million in the United States and Canada. At
the time, it was the biggest grossing
animated film of all time. It was re-released theatrically in 1969, 1979, 1985, and 1991 (which was a surprise hit of that summer), grossing $41.8 million in its first 24 days, It was the first animated feature to gross over $10 million on initial release. The film since grossed well over $200 million Worldwide. And yes, Dalmatians also appealed to a dating crowd.
Franchise/Spinoff-Properties

And that was
long before the live action-remake became an official trend. Having
already written about this live action treatment, I will try not to
repeat myself too much. Other than the remake was released 35 years
later and was a hit. It starred Glenn Close as Cruella, who made an
inspired performance. Jeff
Daniels starred as Roger. And the structure of the movie was influenced by Home Alone. However, Dalmatians received a
sequel that was only made for cashgrab. In May 2021, there was a prequel of Cruella released (with Emma Stone).
As
for the other spinoff-properties, the live action remake received an
animated series spinoff. Released in the fall of 1997, Disney produced 52 episodes of the series. Being the first partnership between Disney and Kellogg's. It was an enjoyable spinoff
which was in the style of Walt`s classic. A direct-to-video
cheapquel was also made during the cheapquel phase (101 Dalmatians II Patch`s Adventure). However, Dalmatians been given another
spinoff in 101 Dalmatians Street, which takes place 60 years after Walt`s classic. Released in 2019, it was made for Disney Plus. Despite how it premeired on Disney Channel first.
Epilogue
![]() |
Yes, even dalmatians can have pyjamas :) |
![]() |
Yes, I`m promoting smoking, since it makes me so happy :) |
![]() |
We`re trying to stare like humans :) |

Bark on my updates on https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100035703494050 and https://twitter.com/NerdyLunada.
References:
101 Dalmatians Diamond Edition
Mouse Under Glass (David Koenig).
The Art of Walt Disney: From Mickey Mouse to the Magic Kingdoms and Beyond (2011 edition, Christopher Finch and John Lasseter).
Disney's Art of Animation: From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas)
Excellent review! I'm amazed at how much content you are able to pack in one article.
SvarSlettGood point that we haven't seen a Disney movie with naturalistic animals in a while. I guess the last one was Bolt.
Not only was Dalmatians the highest grossing movie of 1961, it's also still the second highest grossing Disney animated movie of all time, after Snow White, if you account for inflation.
Even though I prefer the visual style of Sleeping Beauty, I think the visuals for Dalmatians are very distinctive and I'm glad we got the movie the way it looks even if Walt didn't approve at first and it took a while for him to warm up to it. I know he ended up liking the movie enough that he wanted to adapt another one of Dodie Smith's novels.
Although Dumbo was the first contemporary Disney feature, I guess it feels timeless enough with the circus setting that you don't really notice it's set in the 40s unlike Dalmatians with the 60s. It seems like there was one movie every decade after this which was firmly set in its decade. The Rescuers in the 70s, Oliver & Company in the 80s, The Rescuers Down Under in the 90s, and Lilo & Stitch in the 2000s. Also good point that this is the first time the characters don't just become parents at the very end. I also didn't realize, until you pointed it out, that Dalmatians is the first time the lead is a narrator and not a sidekick or omnipresent narrator (like in Cinderella).
I really like the original version of Cruella that talks about her origin and coming from a graveyard. It's very catchy. That's interesting though that the Sherman Brothers wrote a song for the opening (much like their Aristocats opening song) but it never made it into the film, wish I knew what it sounded like. Could you explain why you think the opening titles are anachronistic?
Tibbs is still one of my favorite characters from this movie after Lucky (the dalmatian puppy obsessed with TV). Like you, this movie did not rock my world growing up, especially since I was more familiar with the two live-action movies which were regularly airing on the Disney Channel but I have a much higher opinion of it now.
Hi there! :) Thanks for your kind words :) But remember that my entries aren`t meant to be reviews ;) Just analyses. Sorry for nitpicking. What I mean about the anachronism of the opening titles, is how they are more literal to what`s happening on the screen and less serious. Right? Otherwise, I agree with your points :) Thanks :)
SlettYou're right, your blog posts aren't really reviews as much as a comprehensive history but you do somewhat review the movie by explaining what you liked/disliked as a child and how those views changed when you rewatch as an adult. I understand what you're saying about the opening titles but I'm not sure I would describe that as anachronistic. Anachronistic usually means out of time, like featuring cell phones in Rococo France or George Washington in the Medieval Era. I also don't think I find the opening titles to be tonally at odds with the rest of the movie.
SvarSlett