tirsdag 30. april 2024

"Kung Fu Panda" - The Martial Arts Picture From DreamWorks That Became a Huge Franchise

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize

 
With the release of Kung Fu Panda 4, it would`ve been a perfect synergy to write about it`s predecessor who started this huge and ongoing franchise... 
 
 
 
Don`t worry, my pants won`t rip
from my moves :)

 
We`re standing in line for a
crazy festival :)


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cinderella should`ve been here
with us :) No need to explain
why :)

In 2008, DreamWorks had already settled themselves to the Animation World with their CGI franchises like Shrek and Madagascar. However, in 2008, it was clear that animation had changed completely, as CGI had taken over the animation almost completely. And Hand Drawn Animation had, with a few exceptions, mostly disappeared. However, it was also clear that most animated movies were essentially becoming quite homogenous in tone: Most of the mainstream, American animation were comedies that were shapen by Shrek. And were zany, zippy and zangy, celebrity voice-driven and Pop Culture comedies (with the exception of Pixar, who despite being a part of the formula, weren`t too driven on it). However, since the formula was a success and milked for that reason, a formula can be worn out when it`s used too much. As afterwards there was a little more variety in the Animation Formula.
We`re trying to fly :) In an
animal sense :)

In that sense, it`s hard to place Kung Fu Panda in that aforementioned group. Since it technically does belong to that list, but at the same time it doesn`t. While it`s both zany, zippy and zangy, it`s still does comes across with surprisingly amount of depth and gravity. The overall staple of Kung Fu Panda is mostly a good one, as it was both a critical and commercial success. And pretty much embraced by a wide audience. While it doesn`t have Shrek`s inpact and popularity, it`s still one of the most beloved and respected DreamWorks` franchises. But due to it`s success and franchise-ready premise, it`s no wonder that Kung Fu Panda eventually became a huge and ongoing franchise. A franchise that would last to this day with the release of the fourth movie in the canon.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General Information About Kung Fu Panda

This is how you sneak on your
prey, Kiara :)


Released June 6th, 2008 in the United States, Kung Fu Panda was a high profile movie with an A-List Celebrity Voice Cast like Jack Black (approached by Jeffrey Katzenberg, as the director was a fan of Black), Angelina Jolie (their second DreamWorks gig together after Shark Tale), Dustin Hoffman, Ian McShane, Seth Rogen, Lucy Liu, Michael Clarke Duncan and Jackie Chan. Even Black`s Tenacious T comrades Kyle Gass and J.R. Reed had their parts. The score was composed by DreamWorks veteran Hans Zimmer (The Lion King), this time collaborating with John Powell. 
Even Panda`s can have a
picnic :)

Kung Fu Panda premiered at the Cannes Film Festival on May 15, 2008. It grossed $631.7 million on a budget of $130 million, making it the third highest-grossing film of 2008 and the highest-grossing animated film of the year worldwide. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. Panda was also the first CGI Feature from DreamWorks to be filmed in Cinemascope (despite how it wasn`t the very first to be so, as Spirit Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron preceeded it).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Behind the Scenes Information
 
At least it`s not Tai Chi ;)
Originally Kung Fu Panda was a parody of Martial Arts Films. However, director John Stevenson wanted to make an action-comedy wuxia film with the hero's journey narrative. DreamWorks Animation had  made a PlayStation video game with a similar premise, T'ai Fu: Wrath of the Tiger, in 1999. The biggest influences for Panda were artful martial arts films, as Hero, House of Flying Daggers, Kung Fu Hustle and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. Stevenson's aim for Panda, which took four years to make, was to make "the best looking film DreamWorks has ever made". The Hand-Drawn Animation sequence at the beginning was made to resemble Chinese shadow puppetry. The opening was directed by Jennifer Yuh Nelson (who would direct the first sequel) and produced by James Baxter (animator on Belle in Beauty and the Beast, Rafiki in The Lion King, Spirit in Spirit). And was deliberately trying to look like anime, with a new look.  
Since I`m steeped in
cement, I`m stuck this
way :)

The computer animation was more complex than anything DreamWorks had done before. The animators took a six-hour kung fu class. Originally Po was more of a jerk, but the character changed after they heard Black. He and Hoffman did record together a day. Originally Po was going to live with a mother. To make Po the only panda was a deliberate choice, for making him an outcast. The creators wanted to have a timeless feel to the story, so that`s why there wasn`t any pop songs in the movie. The chopstick fight was the favorite of the audience. And the fake death of Shifu was the biggest laugh in the movie. Angelina Jolie wanted to be Tigress, due to her love for tigers.
















The Stigma of the Title & Animal Cast

My cape was given from
Midas :)

In fact, it would`ve been fairly easy to groan at something like Kung Fu Panda. Because let`s be real, a premise like a Panda doing Kung Fu sounds pretty insipid and silly (no offense to the creators). Even hearing the title Kung Fu Panda could make one cringe. But Panda pretty much puts that predujice and stigma to shame. Sure, Panda is (as aforementioned) fluffy, breezy and fun, but it also does create a little more gravity and substance than excepted. Sure, Shrek had some heart and substance, but it`s still was mostly labeled (and remembered) for it`s comedy. And while Kung Fu Panda never had the same amount of pathos of other Animated Movies, it still had some grave moments. And sure, since it`s title is named after a certain song, it was somewhat semi-mandatory to have the song in the end credits.
I`m learning to fly, but I ain`t
got wings
:)


And sure, since it features an all-Anthrophomorphic Animal Cast, it
would be tempting to say that Panda is perfectly ideal for animation for that lone reason. Due to how animals and animation are essentially synonymous and therefore marketable (and a little tidbit: Sure, it`s remarkably quirky for even giving a goose as a surrogate father to a panda. But it was taken from an concept of Po`s boss being a goose. But hey, to quote the great Beyoncé; Sometimes art doesn`t makes sense. But none of the audience at the previews laughed at the joke.




















The Plot
 
In the Summertime you can
stretch a panda
:)

As for the story in Kung Fu Panda, there`s no need to say there`s simply not much to the story (no offense to the screenwriters). The plot is essentially about premise that is seen in many Martial Arts-Movies: A rookie (who`s essentially a geeked out fanboy) who becomes a champion, guided by his Yoda-Master. And also about a fanboy who enters a world that he`s dreamed about. And also how Po, despite how he has no experience in Kung Fu, is basically the chosen one to save the World from a mission. While it`s a premise that has been shown a lot in many movies, it`s still a premise that works in that story. 
Yeah, I`m tempting ya
with food :)

But Panda
is also a story about an outsider who becomes accepted in a group that he`s not welcomed to and must overcome that challenge. And also a story how a protagonists who (somewhat) goes against his fathers wishes for him (despite how it`s not the main conflict in the film). But 
Panda is also a story about how the passion of the lead (food) becomes a key in achieving his goal. However, Panda is all in all a story about self-worth and self-esteem. Since Po`s goal and mission is not only to literally accept himself, but also gain his self-worth (and Po is both goofy and adorkable in a lead character`s way). Still, the message of the film, while being a little hackneyed (no offense), it`s still very well executed.















 


 
The Villain

I wanted to show that I can be
adorable as cross-eyed :)

However, regarding the villain of Kung Fu Panda (and also the sequel), it`s remarkable how Tai Lung, despite being completely evil, still has a redeemable side to him. And his reasons for being evil is still justifiable and relatable. But it`s remarkable how both villains in both of the first two Kung Fu Panda movies happens to be beloved by a parental figure and still ends up being evil. True that DreamWorks (even when they were doing Hand Drawn Animation) never used to defeat their villains in the same mold that Disney did. 
Yes, I want to outshine the sun
itself :) Don`t ask me why ;)

And even managed to give them at times some complexity (like Rameses in The Prince of Egypt). But it`s remarkable how the villains are still given some potential to redeem themselves with their potentially tragic backstory and still becomes only evil. Regardless of whether it should`ve been perceived as compelling character development, it`s noteworthy how the same arc happens to both villains of both first films. And yes, making the audience to feel sympathy for Tai Lung was a hurdle for the creators.















The Setting
 
I know that we`re from the
other company, but we were
forced to be here :)

Truth to be told, 
Kung Fu Panda wasn`t really different from it`s DreamWorks CGI counterparts. But just like Madagascar, it was a franchise that took place in a exotic, non-White location. But sure, Kung Fu Panda does essentially stereotype it`s setting, by taking the most iconic animal from it`s country (a panda) and making it the protagonist. And sure, since Panda has a Chinese setting, it awfully tempting to compare it to Mulan for that lone reason. But of course that comparison is a shallow one, only due to the setting. But while it`s superfluous to compare them (since they both come from different studios and being in different animated mediums), both movies has a thing in common: For having a rookie training to be a Warrior to save their beloved country from danger. 
Be happy that I`m eating.
There are many childs who
don`t eat at all :)

Despite how it`s more deliberately in Mulan`s case (and yes, it has even one voice actor from Mulan, James Hong, who voiced Chi Fu, voicing Po`s goose father, Ping). But sure, since Panda has a Chinese setting without humans in that World, it would`ve been tempting to scream racism (and the same for having mostly a White cast, with a few exceptions, which was a departure from Mulan). But hey, let`s not go there, shall we? And sure, it has something that has been featured a lot in animation, like bears.


















 
Franchise
 
We`re a panda rainbow :) Sort
of :)

Due to it`s success, it was no surprise that Kung Fu Panda became a mandatory franchise. But it`s become a huge franchise with many forms. The DVD and Blu Ray releases of the first three films were followed by shorts for each movie. Kung Fu Panda: Secrets of the Furious Five (2008), Kung Fu Panda: Secrets of the Masters (2011), Kung Fu Panda: Secrets of the Scroll (2016) and Panda Paws (2016). While the three first shorts lived up to their titles, Panda Paws was about Mei Mei (voiced by Kate Hudson) competing with Bao at the "Spring Festival". However, Kung Fu Panda Holiday also had a TV Special (known as Kung Fu Panda Holiday Special) in 2010. Which was about Po, assigned to host the annual Winter Feast, despite wanting to spend the holiday with Ping. However, Panda has managed to have three TV series so far: Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness (2011-2016), set between the first two films. Kung Fu Panda: The Paws of Destiny (2018-2019), set after the events of Kung Fu Panda 3. And Kung Fu Panda: The Dragon Knight (2022-23) on Netflix.
I`m glad this fan was big
enough for me :)


But of course the most prominent and well-known parts of the franchise are it`s sequels. Just released three years later, Kung Fu Panda 2 arrived in May 2011. Despite being zippy, zangy and zany, it managed to boast more darkness and depth than it`s predecessor. By diving into Po`s origins and backstory (and yes, scrutinizing the fact that he was adopted by a goose) and facing the murderer of his mother, Lord Shen (voiced by Gary Oldman). As for the third film, there was a five year gap between them.
Yes, this is my way of giving
ya a kiss :)

Released in January 2016, Kung Fu Panda 3 showed how Po rejoined his long-lost father, voiced by Bryan Cranston (and having the long-lost Panda village idea from the first film). And frankly, Panda 3 was more in tune with the first movie in tone. But as for the purpose of this entry, Kung Fu Panda has become relevant again with the fourth film in the franchise, Kung Fu Panda 4. Which happened to be released eight years after it`s predecessor. By having a new mission to Po (to give his role as Dragon Warrior away to a follower), it introduces a new character in the Fox bandit Zhen (Awkwafina). And also being the first movie without the Furious Five. Having seen the fourth movie, I must say that I highly enjoyed it. It was frivolous fun in the same way as it`s first predecessor. And it has grossed $503,540,090 so far.
















 
Epilogue
 
At the end, 
I wanted to show that a tiger
can flap it`s wings :)


Kung Fu Panda is among one of the most honorable and
well-liked franchises in DreamWorks` animation and in the animation field in general. Whether it`s become one of the most well-known animated franchises ever, it`s of course something to wonder. But it`s still a respected and beloved franchise, anyway. And sure, it would`ve been easy to wonder if this juggernaut has been milked too much. Since it been given four films. But hey, let`s remember that the same happened with both Shrek and Ice Age-franchise, as well. As for my personal opinion about the franchise, the thing that while I`ve never been gaga for those movies, I`ve still liked them well enough.
This is my way of doing
ballet :) And not the Russian
one :)

Sure, they`ve been mostly made in the same mold as their DreamWorks counterparts and are filled with their trademarks. But at least the two 
first movies in the franchise were, surprisingly enough, filled with pathos and depth, regardless of it`s silliness. But truth to be told, the first movie was the best one and the third and fourth installment were good enough followers. Still, regardless of Kung Fu Panda 4 will be the final chapter in the saga, it`s still nice to see what the franchise has accomplished. And how it`s become one of the most respected entries in Animation in general.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At least we`re not having a pyramid like a Circus :)

 
 
 
 

References:
Kung Fu Panda Blu Ray

torsdag 14. mars 2024

"Thumbelina" - The Don Bluth Fairy Tale Musical Movie Which Was His First Disney Knockoff

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize




I wanted to guide you away from the fire :)





 
I wanted to show that hearts
can be purple and not only
red :)

Don Bluth is a well-known name for many Animation nerds. However,
if we`re going to summarize his style of telling stories, it`s well known that he left a certain company (Disney) to do his own thing. Sure, most of his movies had some Disney elements, but at least Bluth managed to have his own signature style to his movies. As they became somewhat distinctive on their own right. However, fate had different turns for Bluth and Disney, as Bluth was topping the Animation Field with his own style in the late 1980`s. While Disney were slowly climbing up of a dark period. But the beginning of the past Millenium had different turns for them, as Disney were rising up with their new Renaissance Pictures, while Bluth were declining. But Bluth was still not giving up, as he made some new entries to the Animation World. While some of his movies were distinctive, at least he made two films that were deliberately trying to copy the Disney Renaissance style. 
I`m Caught in a Flower,
instead of Caught in the
Middle
, like A1 :)

His most worshipped entry was 1997`s Anastasia, who somewhat made an impact and became regarded for being on par with Renaissance Pictures. However, a lesser known contender would`ve been a predecessor that was released three years earlier than Anastasia. Which was a little picture (no pun intended) called Thumbelina. Released in March 1994, Thumbelina was helmed by both Bluth and his collaborator Gary Oldman and distributed by 20th Century Fox. But it still had a complete Disney ensemble. It featured Disney`s own Princess voice actress Jodi Benson (Ariel in The Little Mermaid) as the titular heroine, Kenneth Mars (Triton) in another Royal part, King Colbert, cartoon veteran voice actress June Foray (Grandmother Fa in Mulan) as Queen Tabitha and even the late Gilbert Gottfried (Iago in Aladdin) as Berkeley Beetle. Even Oliver & Company`s songwriters Barry Manilow (who Bluth adored) and Jack Feldman were behind the songs. John Pomeroy (supervising animator on John Smith from Pocahontas) was among the producers.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Disney Renaissance Elements and the Reputation of Thumbelina
 
I know that you don`t want
your dress to touch the book,
but don`t worry. The book is
not filthy :)

Essentially, Thumbelina was a first for Bluth, the first time where he adapted a fairy tale source. Which means that the overall staple of Thumbelina is that it`s been one of Disney`s copycats. It has all the elements of the Disney Renaissance: A musical adapted from a fairy tale, a perky and feminist heroine (who`s for once given a surrogate mother), a love interest, animal sidekicks and a villain (it even starts in Paris and Notre Dame, two years before Disney would adapt a certain story). And yes, it`s even somewhat a departure from it`s original source material, despite how it does keeps it`s basic elements. 
I`m practicing on a dizzy
ballet. Don`t ask me what it
is ;)

And sure, since Thumbelina was released in a time where Disney was still the King of Animation and when it was the norm to cherish Disney at the expense of their wannabes, Thumbelina had to measure up to it. Still, the overall staple and legacy of Thumbelina is a lackluster one, as it`s been somewhat stuck with a dud-staple. Commecially, it was a Box Office bomb, making only $11.4 million Domestically. As for it`s critical recepetion, it was mostly shunned by critics. And for the reception of the general audiences, it seems to be on the similar league: Sure, Thumbelina has it`s fanbase, but it doesn`t seem to be particularly huge. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
My Own Personal Opinon About Thumbelina
 
We`re so cute that we`ll make
ya forget that we are bugs :)

As for my own experience with Thumbelina do I hate it? For someone who never saw this movie as a child, I never had my childhood bias for it. But watching it as an adult (and even before making this entry), it`s not a complete and utter waste. Neither is it utterly terrible, as it is both enchanting and delightful at times. The songs are catchy, the voice acting is good and it manages to evoke whimsy and wonder. However, it`s still easy to spot it`s flaws: The tone is overall too kid-oriented, many of the comical side-characters are annoying, the story is somewhat episodic and the animation is second-tier. 
Those are my cousins, not my
brothers. And no, they`re not
twice removed :)

Even
the meeting and development between our lovebirds is quite
straight-forward, as it`s development could`ve been easily been taken out from Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs or Sleeping Beauty. Perhaps it`s not regressive, but it`s still not as progressive as Thumbelina`s Renaissance counterparts, where there was actually a development between the leads (And yes, both Thumbelina and Cornelius would resemble it`s Don Bluth followers: Thumbelina`s features does somewhat resemble Anastasia`s. And Cornelius` looks like a predecessor to Anastasia`s love interest, Dimitri and also Cale from Titan A.E. Which some people have ranted about). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 





Behind the Scenes Information

Don`t worry, Cornelius is a
ice cream. So I was dreaming
about an ice cream, not a
guy :)

The first draft of Thumbelina
, written by Carol Flynn Pearson, was
actually very feminist, where Thumbelina didn`t pine for her prince. However, when revising the script, the Prince was too wimpy and Thumbelina was too self-piteous. It had lost the innocence and charm of it`s target audience and was more adult. But when Flynn was urged to change the script, she felt that it didn`t needed to be changed. And due to the budget, Bluth did the adaptation himself. Bluth originally controlled the character designs, but to be fresh, he gave it to Rowland Wilson (who later on moved to Disney). Wilkson even created a backstory to Jacquimo. Betty White was voicing Mrs. Fieldmouse, but her performance lacked energy. So Bluth casted Carol Channing without informing White`s agent. But Channing and White were friends and got to know about their same gigs from each other. So Bluth had to apologize to both of them. 
This is a manual for how you
look before and after this
swordfight :)

Bluth had originally pictured Mr. Mole as stingy, but his voice actor John Hurt gave a completely other take. CGI were used at times. Thumbelina began as the crew finished storyboarding Rock-A-Doodle in 1989-90. The character style was inspired by Bluth's work on Xanadu (1980), an Olivia Newton-John movie which he animated a short scene. Despite it`s semi-unfaithfulness to it`s source material, Thumbelina won awards in Denmark and is shown at the annual Hans Christian Andersen festivals. While Bluth himself has been proud of the project, he`s also expressed it`s faults. He admitted in a 2010 interview that the script could`ve been better. And made Thumbelina herself a stronger character with more spunk. 
These earrings are to those
who wants to scare prissy
women away :) If they become
annyoing :)

However, regarding the comparsion to Disney, Thumbelina received positive ratings on test screenings by having the Walt Disney Pictures logo, fooling viewers to think were watching a Disney movie. Thumbelina was going to be distributed by MGM in US. But But dropped it for the bankruptcy of Bluth's studio. During that time, the court trustee presented the film to Disney, as Disney felt it could fit their style. But the trustee declined Disney's offer. Warner Bros. bought the distribution rights in March 1993. However, Disney bought the rights through their acquisition of Fox, who replaced Warner Bros. as the distributor due to Fox acquiring Don Bluth Ireland Limited.
Cause Margot`s name was
already taken :)

Artists from both Dublin and Burbank studios worked simultaneously on the film. In 1991, Chuck Jones visited the studio during the Dublin Film Festival. And praised Thumbelina seeing a reel. Thumbelina was the hardest voice to cast, due to her sheer size. But Bluth deliberately reached Jodi Benson for her work on Ariel. And Bluth wanted to make Mrs Toad more interesting by making her Spanish, which was why Charo was chosen. And when Bluth asked her, she told him that she was a toad at heart. But when Bluth was drawing the character, he was drawing Charo herself.















Epilogue

My cheeks hurts for posing
like this all day long. Cause
my nails hurt them :)

At the end, it`s hard to conclude something like Thumbelina: A movie that is considered to be overall mediocre as a whole. Sure, it has it`s small fanbase, but it doesn`t seem to have truly risen from the ashes and become a classic. And frankly, it`s easy to see why, for it`s aforementioned flaws. Despite how this entry is not about to completely redeem Thumbelina, it`s still astonishing that it`s (in my opinion) better than anticipated. It may be clunky and a little kid-oriented, but it`s still a charming and delightful little picture.
I thought that lifting my dress
was going to be harder without
a servant. But I could do it
myself! Yay! :)

But it still would be fair to call Thumbelina somewhat semi-forgotten, as it`s been never as worshipped as Disney or even Bluth`s own Princess successor, Anastasia. But yeah, despite how Thumbelina is not particularly perfect, it`s still a pity that it`s been overall stuck with a dud-staple. However, since this entry was meant to synergize with it`s 30th Anniversary (yes, for someone who was a kid during at age, it`s hard to believe that it`s been so long ago), there`s nothing left than to wish Thumbelina Happy 30th Anniversary and may you continue to have many more.
 
 
 






We were increased for this picture :)







References:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QhyFjGlo9g (Don Bluth Thumbelina 1994 Interview)
Somewhere Out There: My Animated Life (Don Bluth)