Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies.
Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.
And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize
Yes, you've read right. It's not April's Fools, folks ;) |
Originally this entry was written where Disney were detracting themselves from the Princess brand. It was written when it was confirmed that Moana wasn't going to join the Princess lineup, yet recently she's been put into more of the marketing of the brand. So yeah, this entry is a little dated now. But it`s been updated later on.
While I've definitively used this following statement before, this entry certainly was a departure from my previous additions. Most of my entries have been analytical rants or assessments about Disney's animated canon features. While this entry was an analytical rant about a certain policy which Disney adapted. Which their desperate attempt to dismiss the Princess stamp and excluding their newest heroines from their lineup.
We're the lovesick version of Brady Bunch. We were told to be so ;) |
The criticism has surrounded for years, long before our scrutinizing message board era. However, the evolution of time and the criticism still made Disney conscious enough to keep up in time and trying to make their heroines more independent, strong-willed and modern. Which the 90's certainly proved, regardless of the various opinions about those gals (though Christopher Finch cites that Ariel wasn't the first Disney heroine with spunk in his The Art of Walt Disney book).
And as for the criticism itself, there's no need to look it up the Internet to find various articles with rants about them (from reporters and otherwise). One recurrent statement (among others) is how their main goal is about their quest for love. But of course that criticism has also been brought up in several books which criticizes the values of the Mouse House (about the following video, the featurette about The Little Mermaid begins at 3:02)
Yes, it's a timeline. In Disney's universe, not an actual one ;) |
But the new millennium saw the rise of the Princess franchise which has lasted to this day! It's needless to refer to my previous entry about the Princess franchise, where I'm deliberately scrutinizing the pro's and con's with the lineup. But it would've been an understatement to dismiss that the franchise has made it's mark on people and influenced them in such a way that they now consider those movies as "Princess"-movies.
The franchise has been a neat and lean way to keep several Princesses relevant. But the brand has also shaped Disney's policy towards them. In that sense, it's no surprising that they've figured to launch their newest Princesses within that franchise at the time, despite how manufactured and gimmicky it may seem. Even Pixar's first Princess, Merida, was been incorporated to it.
But when Moana was released in 2016, Disney changed their policy completely and decided to stop including their upcoming Princesses into the brand! For proof, none of the sisters from Frozen have been included! While I've tapped into this issue in my previous entry, it was originally confirmed that both Anna and Elsa were originally going to join the franchise.
While Disney themselves have never officially confirmed the reason for the non-inclusion, it's obvious how Disney realizes how the Frozen brand has been lucrative at it's own (for obvious reason, duuh). And that it has a unisex appeal.
Other candidates as Sofia the First or Elena from Avalor haven't received an official inclusion either. But since both were Disney Junior properties, it`s a logical reason for not include them. Yet both of them were deliberately made to milk the Princess brand, so it's almost radical to not include them either.
Such a simple gesture is enough to make you a feminist ;) |
But regardless of this, it's notable how the team from her movie have desperately been trying to detract her from the Princess stamp! By contrasting the strong, feminist attributes from the Princess stamp! Of course this is remarkable, due to the Princesses having been acknowledged for their proactive evolution. But regarding their past, why even having the issue of associating a Princess of being strong and fierce? Yet what's even more contradicting is how Moana is frequently featured in current Princess-promotional campaign.
We've been actually frozen. It's freezing, so what did you expect? Pun intended ;) |
A remarkable thing is that Disney themselves are still depicting the progression of their heroines as something entirely new! Ever since Mermaid, most of their heroines have been marketed as being bold, fierce, proactive and not "the stereotypical Disney Princess". Which they've also done with the former Princesses of this Revival era.
It's odd and noteworthy that they're still overstating this stamp, which could be easily be interpreted as Disney themselves are labeling the Princess stamp as negative. But the feminism attributes within the heroines are still going strong! Just look at how feminist the Princesses of the live action remakes of the animated features are being labeled as (and yes, een Belle in the live action remake has her anti-Princess comment, despite that it's possible to ignore it's non-Princess agency, haha). Even Jasmine in the live action version of Aladdin had her feminist agenda. But the irony is how the majority of the new Princesses actually serves trope of not being a stereotypical damsel, haha! If you think about it, the lineup is more full of non-typical Princesses than the stereotypical damsels!
This is what boredom does to ya :) |
The more, the merrier, but more as in less space to move within ;) |
At least the latter issue has a legit excuse, hence the lineup would've been easily overfilled! However, writer Jonathan Brill have cited in a assessment that the royal titles of the Revival gals have barely affected their narrative at all. While of course this is debatable, it's still can be perceived as legit enough.
Of course my assessment was not meant to be a direct attack towards Disney themselves. Or an assessment to persuade them to change their policy. It's just meant to be an analytical rant about it. But whatever Disney decides in the future for their royal sweethearts, we'll have to wait and see. Of course the enduring criticism which Disney Princesses have received could also affect other fictional female characters as well. But we'll leave that discussion for now ;)
Yes, I'm being self-absorbed, folks. I have human emotions after all :) |
Rhetorical catchphrase, isn't it? But lucky us, we have the privilege to do so ;) |
References:
Mouse Under Glass (David Koenig)
The Art of Walt Disney: From Mickey Mouse to the Magic Kingdoms and Beyond (Christopher Finch).
Disney's Art of Animation: From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas)
The Mouse That Roared: Disney and the End of Innocence (Henry Giroux)
Tale As Old As Time: The Art and Making of Beauty and the Beast (2017 version, Charles Solomon)
The Making of Beauty and the Beast (Bob Thomas)
Disney D23 Magazine Fall 2016
Waking Sleeping Beauty DVD.
https://goodmenproject.com/arts/much-revealed-power-of-the-princess-panel-d23/
http://www.heraldextra.com/entertainment/columnists/francine-brokaw/princess-power-shines-at-disney-expo/article_51c3f93a-d8fc-503e-bffc-0ac6df124dfe.html
http://highschool.latimes.com/orange-county-school-of-the-arts/the-power-of-the-princess-panel-highlights-from-d23-expo-2017/
http://www.disneyinyourday.com/2017/07/28/d23-expo-2017-the-power-of-the-princess/
http://www.rotoscopers.com/2017/07/15/d23-expo-2017-the-power-of-the-princess/
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6466765193322298364&pli=1#publishedposts
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-ae-0127-borrelli-20130125-column.html
http://www.dvdizzy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32079&start=140
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170606005564/en/Walt-Disney-Animation-Studios-Pixar-Animation-Studios
http://www.dvdizzy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32441&start=40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuHR5ZOWp-U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDjxkhRj19Q
http://firescholars.seu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=honors
https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/academic/appliedsocialstudies/docs/AshleeHynes.pdf
http://kereeachan.tumblr.com/post/147287404742/moana-is-not-going-to-added-to-the-disney-princess
https://jonnegroni.com/2016/12/09/in-case-you-missed-it-moana-finally-settled-the-disney-princess-debate/
https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-Disney-officially-named-Anna-or-Elsa-as-a-Disney-Princess
https://blog.animationstudies.org/?p=1381
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism
https://books.google.co.vi/books?id=E8Pj3FtAoAQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/beautyandthebeastghinson_a0a71b.htm
https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/272262
https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2013/11/27/animated_frozen_will_warm_your_heart_movie_review.html
https://storyofaphoenix.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/finding-the-glass-slipper-a-feminist-analysis-of-the-disney-princess-films/
http://www.cracked.com/blog/4-ways-disney-princesses-created-modern-feminism/
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/moana-and-elena-of-avalor-to-not-join-the-disney-princess-lineup
http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20161128-the-controversy-behind-disneys-groundbreaking-new-princess
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-little-mermaid-1989
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhwxTQYeY2o
https://twitter.com/_CraigGerber/status/815265680257908736
https://storify.com/sternb13/the-disney-princess-effect-on-young-girls-and-femi
http://www.neontommy.com/news/2011/01/princess-effect-are-girls-too-tangled-disneys-fantasy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/24/princess-culture-is-bad-for-girls-now-theres-proof/?utm_term=.3b7cc0816ca6
http://diply.com/virginradiolebanon/article/disney-princesses-worst-role-models
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/27/opinion/oe-brooks27
http://the-artifice.com/feminism-disney-princesses/
http://time.com/3667700/frozen-brave-disney-princesses-heroes-and-sexism/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3954230/Disney-s-Beauty-Beast-promotes-domestic-violence-Bizarre-lesson-plan-claims-Belle-abusive-relationship-Snow-White-domestic-skivvy-seven-dwarves.html
http://feministfiction.com/2014/01/08/the-unforgivable-pinkness-of-disney-princesses/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/business/media/a-new-disney-princesa-carries-responsibilities-beyond-her-kingdom.html?_r=2
http://feministfiction.com/2012/07/17/some-day-my-prince-will-come-disney-princesses-vs-merida/
http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=dissentingvoices
http://www.dvdizzy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32222&start=540
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar