mandag 28. februar 2022

"Beauty and the Beast" - An Celebration of it`s 30th Anniversary and In-Depth Summary of It's Content and Legacy

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize


Since I've started two entries about most of the first movies of the Disney Renaissance, it would be unfair to leave out an entry about the movie who`s essentially perceived as the cornerstone of the Renaissance. But my second entries about them have tried to be different from their predeccesors: My entry about the Genie was essentially about the character and the shaping of Disney's sidekicks. While my second entry of The Little Mermaid was a comparison to it's Japanese predecessor. So, just like my second entry for The Lion King, this entry will rather be an Analysis about it's Legacy and content. Originally I was planning to release this at the Fall of 2021. But due to how it`s been 30 years since it was nominated for a Best Picture at the Academy`s the following February, it`s tempting to synergize it with that month.
 
 
 
 
I`m glad you learned to touch my hand without having your claws sink within my hands, Beast :)

 
 
 
At least it`s without
The Troggs ;)
Out of all of the Fabulous Four of the Disney Renaissance, perhaps none is more credited than Beauty and the Beast. At least Beauty has a position that none of it's predecessors and followers had; Having it`s aforementioned Best Picture Nomination at the Oscars. However, while Beauty's vigor lies in that nomination, it happens to be invigorating for other reasons: It was the first Animated Feature to ever cross the $ 200 barrier. However, while Beauty is certainly a beloved and cherished movie that is influential to it's followers, it's position is really interesting to examinate among Disney historians and also Disney themselves: It seems to be hailed as the Pinnacle of Disney Animation. 
The Sparkles are so well
hidden :) Which makes
them special :)

In fact, the crew have stated several times that Beauty and the Beast simply was their favorite film to work on several occasions. Besides that position, the truth is that it`s simply put on a pedestal of being perfect by various people (despite having it's faults). Which makes Beauty's position quite obvious for us Disnerds. But regardless of it`s staple, Beauty happened to have it`s own Anniversary in the Fall of 2021. As it finally turned 30 years old. And for us who were kids during it`s release, it`s hard to believe that it`s been over 30 years since this movie came and made it`s huge and important impact on animation.












My Own Personal History With Beauty and the Beast
 
This is how to treat your ex-
boyfriend, girls :)

As for myself, I've stated previously that besides The Rescuers Down Under, The Lion King was the movie that truly converted me to appreciate the Disney Renaissance. As aforementioned, for some reason, Walt's classics spoke more to me than the latest pictures, because there was a sheer innocence and charm to them. For some reason, these new classics didn't quite appeal to me before Lion King. While I liked both Mermaid and Aladdin, none of them were actually my items of obsession, as those who my favorite Disney features were.
We`re shining at the expense
of the bleak castle :)


So for a long while, Beauty and the Beast happened to be my least favorite among the squad. Mainly because the film didn't appeal to me at all. And frankly because it was too dark and too sophisticated for my taste and therefore simply boring at times (please don`t hate me for it). However, growing older made me learn to appreciate it more. And it wasn't until I became an adult where I truly learned to love it for it's strengths (it's brilliant songs, score) to a point where it was hard to see how I couldn't love it.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 The Innovations of Beauty and the Beast

I`m glad I`m not allergic
to dandylions :)

No matter the position of Beauty and the Beast, at least it was praised at the time for having genuine innovations in a Disney fairy tale. And actually turning them on their heads: A Villain who's handsome and who doesn't have the heroine fall for him because of his looks (which was a lot of fun to do for the directors to do). A real development to the relationship between the lovebirds (which is even stated in the film by Mrs Potts). And last, but not least a heroine who reads and who doesn't pine for her Prince (despite how initially Belle would pine for someone to share adventure with). In fact, Belle must be one of the most likable Princesses ever.
I was so excited that
it wasn`t hard for me
to climb :)

Having the typical and stereotypical Princess kindness, yet having guts and balls to be assertive when it's needed. In fact, while the following Heroines developed independence and spunk, at least Belle got genuine credit for her modern, feminist streak. Despite that some naysayers have whined about her not being Feminist enough. Yet for all her faults, Belle does actually save the Beast at the very end and is quite proactive. While Ariel was essentially the first heroine who broke the feminist mold, Belle was a worthy successor to her for being proactive on her own right.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

The Other Innvovations With Beauty and the Beast: The Best Picture Nomination and The Unfinished New York Film Festival Screening

Yay, they`ve managed to have
us look canny :)

But of course what Beauty and the Beast is mostly known for, is it's Oscar Nomination for Best Picture (being the third time where Disney were nominated for it, after Mary Poppins). At a time long before Best Animated Picture actually existed. This nomation was both expected and unexpected.
I forgot to have my coke
today :)

But such a nomination for was truly something innovative for Disney and therefore Disney marketed the heck out of it. However, there were some criticism against it. The general consensus among observers were that actors (who make up the Academy`s membership) wouldn`t vote for an animated film. While there were some who believed that no other animated picture would receive that honor, it would take almost two decades before two other animated features under the Disney umbrella got nominated (Up and Toy Story 3). But Beauty is forever known for that innovation. And there are still purists that truly believe that Beauty should've won that Oscar, due to what is considered to be a weak competiton (the Award went to Silence of the Lamb).
Just say the mantra from
Finding Nemo
: Birds are
friends, not food :)

But at least the nomination was a part to erase the stigma of animation being a kid medium. As aforementioned in my previous entry, Beauty reasonated with people for it's substance, depth and complexity. Which was most likely the main reason for even getting nominated. Even for a weird kid like myself could see that Beauty had a sophistication and a depth that made it catered to an older audience. But at least it won the Golden Globe for Best Picture.
Don`t get used to it, it`s
quite exclusive to have a
progress look :)

Another first with Beauty is how it was pre-screened at the New York Film Festival in Lincoln Center in September 1991. In an unfinished version (which actually opened the Festival). It was something that the creators were dubious about. Still the film pleased the audiences and gave it standing ovation (apparently the audiences applauded at the end of each number). And gave the film a buzz (as many compared the buzz similar to the buzz around Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs at it`s time. As ironically, the same thing happened when Walt was forced to show the film to the Bank of America, in order to give it money). Despite that the movie was further along than the Festival demanded, so they had to retro a little bit. It was an amazing experience for the crew. It was also screened at the Cannes Film Festival, where it also gained a 10-minute standing ovation. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
How Beauty and the Beast`s Sophistication Influenced The Following Renaissance Features

I`m blended by the
white light:)

However, Beauty and the Beast`s ambitious nature somewhat unfortunately led to the downfall of the Disney Reniassance. At least in a way. There's no secret that Beauty`s goals actually lead to a bigger ambition for their upcoming pictures. And therefore the studio pushed for films who not only could win the award, but also becoming more mature in themes. While it`s well known that Disney didn't have faith in The Lion King at the beginning, at least it continued the gravity that Beauty began with.
Without money :)
Afterwards came Pocahontas, a film that was deliberately shaped to be an Oscar contender. But unfortunately ended up missing it's both targets. The same could be said about The Hunchback of Notre Dame. A film that was essentially a remake of Beauty (for sharing it's similar tropes). Perhaps Hunchback wasn't aiming for the Oscar bait. But it was certainly grand in ambition and managed to have quite amount of depth and substance of it's own right. Despite being a dramatically uneven and jarringly so (without going into that much debate now). Which is somewhat a pity, since both Pocahontas and Hunchback were fairly ambitious on their own right and could`ve enhanced the ambitions from Beauty.
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
The Stockholm Syndrome Accusations

And yes, I`ll break it
by force :)

However, the biggest controversy of Beauty and the Beast is how it`s been basically accused for portraying Stockholm Syndrome. Which it's clearly not doing. In my previous entry about the movie I've adressed this issue and made it clear that it`s not about syndrome at all. Yet there are still many people who honestly believe that it`s about that syndrome. While it's fair to see why people would think so, as it`s essentially a story about a girl falling in love with her pre-abusive capturer. However, she doesn`t comes around when before he stops his abusive behavior and learns to change his ways of behaving.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
The Criticisms of Beauty and the Beast and How The Live Action Remake Tried to Fix Them

Without love :)
However, a staple that Beauty and the Beast has always been stuck with is about it's various plotholes. Not only from fanboys, but from authors as well (especially from David Koenig). About how Be Our Guest states that "10 years we've been rusting" (indicating that the Prince would be only 11 when he was spelled, despite how it`s never confirmed). And how the Prince answered the door when he had servants. Why the servants were enchanted and how Maurice is the only one who gets lost while looking for the Castle. 
At least it`s without
Ella and Giselle :)

And how Mrs Potts is too old to be Chip's mother and how the castle is separated from the village. And that not all of the enchanted objects used to be humans. These holes have been discussed forever and have plagued the film during in our scrutinizing era of Internet. So it's not strange how the live action version of Beauty actually took care of these questions and answered them for it's retelling. But not everyone where happy about this, as many people (among them being Lindsay Ellis) meant that it was unnecessary to answer them, as they weren`t necessary for the story.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 The Live Action Remake

So it would be perfect time to discuss the much debated live action remake of Beauty and the Beast. Which was released in 2017. While both the remakes of Cinderella and The Jungle Book proved that these live action remakes could be redeemable, there were a lot anticipation for the one of Beauty. But unlike those two previous remakes, there was a more lukewarm reception to Beauty. Mostly due to that it essentially was a carbon copy of it's animated predecessor and perceived as an inferior copy. But the live action of Beauty essentially combined elements from the original tale and Disney's version. And managed to fix the scrutinies that had surrounded the film. But it was a huge success, nonetheless. Despite how unlike it`s animated predecessor, it never actually received a nomination for Best Picture.
 
 
 
 
 
 




 
 
The Development Between the Beast, Gaston and Belle

However, regarding the development of the two major male leads (yes, forgive me for repeating myself): Both Gaston and the Beast have been perceived for being equal jerks, as both of them are douches. I guess that scrutiny is fair. Both Gaston and Beast actually perceive Belle as an item for their good in their own way. However, the real difference between them is that Beast learns his way of humanity, while Gaston doesn't. In fact, it`s remarkable how Beast and Gaston has simultaneously their own development happening the same time during the course of their change of nature. 
I wanted to
look manly
without a
gun :)

I can`t understand
how anyone from
Toy Story can resist
being in a box :)

Yet regarding the focus of our two titular leads, it's still Beast's who`s given the biggest and most overt arc. While Belle's arc is more understated and subdued (while some believes that she doesn`t really go through an arc, her development is about learn to see what`s beneath the surface. As stated in Something There). But it was first and foremost Beasts`s arc that interested the directors in the first place, as it was Howard Ashman who believed that he should go through an arc that was both internal and external.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
The Spinoff Properties & Re-Releases
 
It stands for U :)
However, unsurprisingly Beauty and the Beast has been milked by Disney in several ways: By two Direct-to-Video Cheapquels (which remarkably enought none of them are actual continuations, but rather expansions of Belle's time as a hostage. And that Beast remains a Beast. Most likely due to that it's his most well known appearance). Sing Me a Story With Belle was a TV series made for children. And we all know that Beauty was the first of the Disney properties to actually grace Broadway (as it was confirmed to be the Best Broadway Musical to not be on Broadway at that time). Despite how there were naysayers who were laughing at the idea, it became one of the longest running Broadway shows in history.
We wanted to be Hillbillies :)
Don`t ask why :)

But as for changes to the movie itself, an important addition was with Human Again in the 10th Anniversary Re-Release at IMAX in 2002 (inspired by George Lucas` re-release of Star Wars with new material). It was originally intended for the movie, but it was deleted because it was too long. 
My jump is impressive,
right? :)

But the creators desperately wanted to show the point of view of the objects. So when it worked in the Stage version, they decided they could put it in the movie (the original animators were a part of it). As a part of the 3D-trend, Beauty was also released on 3D in 2012 (with the release of the Tangled Ever After short). And since Belle became a mandatory member of the official Princess Franchise, her presence in the lineup has been huge. And yes, Beauty also started the career of a certain Canadian Starlet named Celine Dion. With her version of the end credits single, Beauty and the Beast.









 
Epilogue
 
Don`t worry, we`re usually
enemies otherwise :)
Regardless of the perfection staple that Beauty and the Beast has been stuck with, would it be fair to label it as perfect? Well, for those of you who wants to, then you`re welcome. But as for me personally, it's not unflawed. The animation is somewhat inconsistent (no offense to the animators), the slapstick comedy is somewhat off-putting and Gaston is not particularly as strong (in my eyes) as many people wants him to be. Still, I`ve personally learned to love Beauty during the years. And while it would be tempting to scrutinize why it never actually appealed to me as a kid, it`s incredible that I didn`t care for it at all. 
I`ll tell ya a secret: It ain`t bad
being small :)
Now as an adult, I`ve come to realize it`s strengths: It`s wonderful music, a great heroine and it`s general sense of whimsy, wonder and magic. But ironically, the thing that made the movie off-putting to me as a child, made me actually to respect and admire it as an adult: It`s complexity and depth. No matter what, Beauty is still a rousing success and a movie that truly changed animation and made it`s inpact on the memdium. And deservedly so. It has gained a huge Legacy and will continue to do so through many years. So at the end, there`s nothing left to wish Beauty Happy Past 30th Anniversary and may you continue to have many more.


 
 
 
And that`s why it`s seen through roses and shadows :)

 
 
 
 
References:
Beauty and the Beast Diamond Edition 
Tales as Old as Time The Art and Making of Beauty and the Beast (Charles Salomon)
Beauty and the Beast Platinum Edition
The Making of Beauty and the Beast (Bob Thomas) 
Beauty and the Beast Walt Disney Signature Collection
Disney`s Art of Animation From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas)
Walt Disney Legacy Collection Beauty and the Beast
The Art of Walt Disney From Mickey Mouse to Magic Kingdoms (Christopher Finch)
Mouse Under Glass (David Koenig) 
Waking Sleeping Beauty

lørdag 29. januar 2022

Walt Disney - The Man, Entrepeneur and Innovator Who Started an Entire Legacy, Empire and Everything That`s Disney

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize




We behaved yesterday, so therefore we were allowed to sit on his shoulders :)




We`re swift at hiding
within him :)

For everyone who`s ever known Disney knows the phrases that "it all started with a mouse". Or "that it all started with a Princess". While those statements are technically true, the truth is that everything started with their founder himself. In other words, Walt Disney. Regardless of what a person he was or what you personally thought of him, it`s incredible to think what a legacy he`s left the world. As hackneyed this sounds, Walt was more than just a person. Or a leader. He was a visionary, an innovator, a person that was a driving force in more ways than one. Introducing several developments of a cartoon.
No, I didn`t drew
him :) I was
instructed as a
stand-in :)

Considering that he managed to mark himself in a world that was different and a world where technology was slowly making it`s mark, it would be questionable of how Walt alone would`ve made his same mark today. But Walt was mostly credited for all his content. And was the first celebrity in animation. Considering that his movies and animation have managed to shape a whole generation who wasn`t even born during his lifetime. And as hackneyed as it sounds, without Walt, there wouldn`t have been such a great empire that he left the World. And since that it`s been 120 years since his Birth in December of 2021, there`s no other way than to honor him with this entry with the man who started it all (pardon this intended pun).










Walt`s Origins

Walter Elias Disney was born in December 5th, 1901. He was the fourth son of Elias Disney‍ and Flora. In 1906, the family moved to a farm in Marceline, Missouri. Walt spent most of his childhood working, with a father who was kind of brutal. Walt was a fun-loving kid who loved practical jokes and didn`t have much time to fun and play. Marceline was one of the few places where Walt was allowed to be a child and be happy. Yet the family couldn`t really afford the farm, so they moved.  
In 1917, Elias bought stock in a Chicago jelly producer, the O-Zell
Company, and moved back to the city with his family. Disney enrolled at McKinley High School and became the cartoonist of the school newspaper, drawing patriotic pictures about World War I. He also took night courses at the Chicago Academy of Fine Arts. After forging the date of birth on his birth certificate, he joined the Red Cross in September 1918 as an ambulance driver. He was shipped to France but arrived in November, after the armistice. He drew cartoons on the side of his ambulance for decoration and had some of his work published in the army newspaper Stars and Stripes. He returned to Kansas City in October 1919 where he worked as an apprentice artist at the Pesmen-Rubin Commercial Art Studio, where he drew commercial illustrations for advertising, theater programs and catalogs, and befriended fellow artist Ub Iwerks.










Walt`s Works
 
I`m so proud over
steering :) I wasn`t
allowed, since I`m a
mouse :)


Walt has been well known for his work. But the first things he did haven`t been as remembered as his later work. With Iwerks and Fred Harman from Film Ad Co, Walt produced the Laugh-O-Grams shorts, which were modernized fairy tales. He did Alice in Wonderland, which combined live action and animation. Afterwards he did Oswald the Lucky Rabbit (urged by the boss of Universal Pictures), to compete with Felix the Cat. And Oswald was a huge success. But due to a conflict with the distribution of Oswald, Walt worked on one certain famous mouse secretly (which created the first cartoon short with sound, Steamboat Willie). Walt also provided the voice to Mickey (and labeled him as his alter ego). But Walt didn`t wanted his studio to be known for just one character. So Carl Stalling suggested that they should do shorts based on musical compositions. Which became The Silly Symphonies (which began with Skeleton Dance). The Award Winning Flowers and Trees introduced color to a cartoon (and had to be repainted in order to adjust to them). Characters like Goofy, Donald Duck and Chip and Dale were created afterwards.
Walt`s first movie was
The letters on my
name were simplified
for reasons of
simplicity :)
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
.
But since it was known for being the first full-length feature ever made (at least in the US, since it wasn`t technically the very first one), it was known as Disney`s Folly. Since the world was critical towards a full-length animated feature. But Snow White turned out to be a huge sensation and proved all the critics wrong. In fact, Snow White`s success surpassed the success of his following films during the following decade, with the exception of Dumbo. As Pinocchio, Fantasia and Bambi underperformed, since the foreign markets were cut (which had the company owing $4 million to the Bank of America in 1944). But fortunately three of them managed to recoup their losses afterwards (Walt was an eternal optimist who believed that his work would gain their redemption afterwards). 
They had to make space for
me to fly :)

During World War II, Walt managed to make the package features. Which were compilation features, but were considered as a part of his Official List of Animated Features. However, Walt returned to full-lenght animation with another fairy tale feature in Cinderella. Which proved to be another huge hit. The 1950`s was certainly a successful time for Walt. With the exception of Alice in Wonderland, most of the features released during the decade were successes (despite how Sleeping Beauty was somewhat perceived as an underperformance).
I`m not holdning a gun, I`m
holding a stick that`s supposed
to be one :)

It`s well known that Walt`s interest in full-length animation was decreased during the last decade of his lifetime. His time was mostly devoted to Disneyland (which opened in July 1955 in Anaheim, California) and his television shows. The first one being Walt Disney's Disneyland, an anthology of animation, live-action features and other material from the studio's. The show was successful in ratings and profits. And had the five-part miniseries Davy Crockett which was an overnight sensation". The theme song, The Ballad of Davy Crockett, became popular, and ten million records were sold. Which made forming his own record production Disneyland Records. His other TV Show was The Mickey Mouse Club. Which featured a regular, but ever-changing cast of mostly teen performers. In 1965, he began working on Disney World in Florida, influenced by the cleanliness and layout of the Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen, Denmark. 
The puppies couldn`t make
it, so the spots came instead :)

While Walt and his studio was a diversified company who released various live action features who have become memorable, his studio has been known for animation, first and foremost. During the 1960`s, there were three features released: One Houndred and One Dalmatians, The Sword in the Stone, Mary Poppins (while not being completely animated, has still been regarded to belong to this list) and The Jungle Book. The latter being a movie that he didn`t even lived enough to see. But being the very last movie Walt ever worked on. During the 60`s, he also made the Winnie the Pooh shorts, which later became a movie, as he had envisioned them to be.







 
 
Walt`s Reputation & Dedication

Regardless of whether you love Disney as a company, it`s irrelevant if you loved Walt as a person. Because let`s face it: It`s possible to love the content of an artist and not the person him/herself. And the unfortunate truth is that Walt was mostly known for being a ruthless boss (the line "Man is in the forest" was used when he came). In reality, while most people have more layers than being just good or bad (cause let`s face it, that`s how humans are), Walt was mostly stuck with a bad reputation. He rarely praised the work of his staff and using "that`ll work" as his best compliment. Instead, Disney gave high-performing staff financial bonuses, or recommended certain individuals to others, expecting that his praise would be passed on. 
However, people who knew Walt superficially had many good things to say about him. That he was the Grandfather every kid would want. Children who worked with Walt had nothing but good things to say about him: That he was accessible to work with and was comfortable with them (despite how reports says that he was the opposite). And that he was very jovial and wanted to be referred to by his first name. And that he cared for his workers and made them make mistakes. But it`s also been said that Walt was an incredibly shy man who took upon a facade, despite that there was a part of him who loved attention. He never thought of himself of a major star. Still he acknowlegded that he personally did the things that his public persona didn`t (like smoking and drinking).
Both Roy Disney and Ub Iwerks labeled Walt as being perky and enthusiastic. And apparently he was a great father to his two daughters, Diane and Sharon (who was adopted). Yet Walt was known for being a great storyteller who was truly skilled with telling tales. Yet Walt was also known for being an everlasting perfectionist, who lived for perfectionism. Which was one of the reasons why his movies took so long time to make. Still it was also well known that Walt wanted for every laugh to be a tear. Walt was eager for ethos and pathos. But yes, Walt was also pretty much an embodiment of the American Dream. For coming from a humble background and working himself up (which was a reason for why he never forgot about labor). And yeah, Walt`s mantra was to not make cartoons for children, but for the child within. 
It was Genie who duplicated
us :)










Walt`s Demise & The Fate of the Studio Afterwards
    
I want to show the world
how great it is to ride my
boss :)
I want to show that I`m
the star, not my boss :)
So yeah, no wonder that the studio didn`t know what to do without their boss (which fueled the famous phrase "what would`ve Walt done"). As he died before his work on both parks were completed. While the studio was struggling after Walt`s death, it`s true that things didn`t go downhill immediately after Walt`s death. Still the Renaissance in the 1990`s was seen as the true comeback of the Disney Studios, as well as the Revival (despite how there are various opinions about that era). 
We`re the Family Guy version
of Disney`s World :)
Nevertheless, it would be tempting to wonder what he would`ve think of the studio if he was still alive. But yeah, since we live in a time where hand drawn animation has been reduced to a bare minimum, there have been some theories about how Walt would`ve most  approved CGI animation as well. Which is a plausible theory, but still not a foolproof one. In 2009, the Walt Disney Family Museum, opened in the Presidio of San Francisco, designed by Diane Disney and her son Walter E. D. Miller.









Awards







Epilogue

So yeah, everyone who`s ever loved Disney can pretty much thank Walt for starting his huge Empire. While that said, this entry is my fourth entry about a important person within Disney. So in that case, it makes pretty much sense to start one about the one who started it all. However, the difference between this entry and it`s predecessors is how this entry revolves around a person who passed away long ago.
And regardless of how Walt personally was and what could be said about him, at least he`s managed to be a driving lifeforce for an entire World. And give a legacy to a whole generation of children. And giving them fond memories they could cherish into adulthood and shaped an entire generation of Disnerds. While it may seem superfluous to thank a person who`s passed away, there`s nothing left to honor Walt and thank him for his everlasing influence and legacy that will last forever.




Look, rodent-haters. Not every rodent is toxic ;)



 
References:
PSB American Experience 2015 Walt Disney Documentary 
https://web.archive.org/web/20091003001653/http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/1790811%2Cdisney-walt-museum-san-francisco-092709.article
Disney's Art of Animation: From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas)
Sleeping Beauty Platinum Edition 
Once Upon a Dream From Perrault`s Sleeping Beauty to Disney`s Maleficent (Charles Solomon)