torsdag 31. juli 2025

"The Black Cauldron" - The Dark, But Dismissed and Neglected Disney Animated Feature Who Was the Black Sheep of Disney, But Became a Cult Classic

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize

 
 
 
 
I wanted to prove that Arthur wasn`t the only one who could lift a sword :)

 
 
 
We needed to have different
colors, to diversify :)

While Disney has always been divided through successful and 
less successful periods, the truth is that every studio has it`s Black Sheep. Most companies has a movie who`s universally loathed or has a bad reputation. But it`s hard to find a movie who`s gotten that reputation during Walt`s time, due to how his movies are essentially perceived as classics. During Walt`s time, it`s contradictory how most of the movies that followed Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs weren`t regarded as successful enough financially. Both Bambi and Fantasia received harsh criticism during their first releases, but were regarded as classics afterwards. However, Alice in Wonderland was considered to be a Black Sheep during the Second Golden Age, but got rid of that bad staple during the years. 
And that`s why we`ll remind 
ya why you shouldn`t forget
us :)
But The Sword in the Stone was considered to be a minor Black Sheep through Walt`s time. But as for the following movies after Walt`s death, the truth is that despite how the movies who followed were financially successful, neither The Aristocats or Robin Hood were perceived as classics by Disney historians. While The Rescuers was perceived as somewhat of a classic. The Fox and the Hound`s position was more tangible, as it was credited by critics, but never truly regarded as a classic. But the following movie would essentially become the Black Sheep of the Black Era. A movie that would truly be regarded as a Black Sheep in Disney`s history after Walt`s death. And that is none other than The Black Cauldron.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

General Information About The Black Cauldron
 


Released in July 1985, The Black Cauldron was directed by Ted Berman and Richard Rich (who had previously directed The Fox and the Hound and would later on direct The Swan Princess).
It`s loosely based on the first two books in The Chronicles of Prydain by Lloyd Alexander, a series of five novels based on Welsh mythology. It was the first Disney animated film to be recorded in Dolby Stereo. And the first film to receive a PG rating, as well as the first to feature computer-generated imagery. It was also the first feature produced by Silver Screen Partners II. It was also presented in Super Technirama 70, the first since Sleeping Beauty. Being the most expensive animated film ever made at the time, it was a box-office bomb, grossing just $21.3 million against a budget of $44 million. Putting the future of Disney's animation in jeopardy. Because of its failure, Disney didn`t release the film on home media until 1998, as enough fans requested it. It has since gained a cult following. 
Nigel Hawthorne (who voiced Professor Porter in Tarzan) voiced Fflewddur. Animators like Andreas Deja, Mark Henn (his first gig at Disney), Ruben Aquino, George Scribner Hendel Butoy, Dale Baer, Ron Husband, Jay Jackson, Barry Temple, Kathy Zielinski, Tony Anselmo, Mauro Maressa and Mike Gabriel were among the crew. Don Paul, Mark Dindal and Barry Temple were among the effect animators. Don Griffith was the layout supervisor. Lisa Keene worked with the background. Deja designed the characters. Don Hahn was the production manager. Ron Miller was the executive producer. Art Stevens, Mel Shaw, John Musker, Ron Clements and Burny Mattinson worked on the story. Eric Larson was an animation consultant. Anthony DeRosa was a breakdown artist. Kelly Asbury, Steve Hickner, Gary TrousdaleDave Bossert and Rob Minkoff were in-between artists. Howard E. Green was the publicist of the movie. 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Reception and Staple of The Black Cauldron
 
We`re not having a romantic
gaze. We`re playing how to
gazing without blinking :)
The reception for The Black Cauldron is not hard to see for any Disney-fan. It`s regarded as being the Black Sheep of the first Dark Era of Disney. And sure, it`s legacy pretty much lives up to it`s staple. Since the first periods that followed Walt`s demise has never been regarded as successful by Disney historians or Disney themselves, Cauldron is regarded to belong to the lowest of lows. Both by Disney historians and the audiences. Neither Jeffrey Katzenberg nor Michael Eisner liked the picture. Sure, the dud-staple not a part that Cauldron shares alone, as both Home on the Range and Chicken Little shares a similar staple (and sure, it would`ve been tempting to put both Pocahontas and The Hunchback of Notre Dame from the Renaissance into this category. But frankly, while they were the Black Sheeps, they weren`t as universally loathed as the aforementioned features). 
We`re the odd trio. Don`t ask 
us why :)
As for it`s final ratings, it`s not rated particularly highly on Imdb nor on Popcornmeter. But it still has 81% likes on Google. Which confirms that it has it`s fanbase after all. As for my personal opinion, I remember actually buying the DVD when I was in my early twenties and seeing the movie. Frankly, at the time I thought it was pretty meh, generic and forgettable. But after seeing it again, I discovered that it had it`s charms and perks. And frankly that it was better than I remembered. But Lloyd Alexander had a more complicated reaction to the film. He liked the movie, but found that there was little resemblance between the movie and the book. As he thought the books had more depth. But while Cauldron is rarely promoted, the characters have made some appearances at the Disney Parks and Resorts in Fantasyland. And they`ve appeared in House of Mouse, during the episode House of Magic.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
The Dark Tone of The Black Cauldron
  
Electricity. It`s gonna be big :)

But regardless of it`s staple for being dismissed, The Black
Cauldron is also known for it`s sheer darkness. It`s known for being one of Disney`s darkest films. Sure, it wasn`t the only one to be dark, as the following Hunchback would`ve also been known for it`s darkness (and frankly, Sleeping Beauty had it`s very dark moments). Sure, most of Walt`s early classics were known for their darkness and even some of the following movies from the Renaissance (as Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King). And let`s not forget our dear Frozen.
The black cauldron was 
missing at the moment :)
But Cauldron would`ve especifically been labeled for it. But it was essentially something that was perceived as a weakness by many. However, what perhaps makes
Cauldron even more distinctive is that it doesn`t feel quite as Disney in tone. It`s not as fuzzy and warm as Disney are usually known for and comes across like a feature from another studio, almost Don Bluth-esque. And yes, it has been compared to the animated Lord of the Rings from 1978 (which is a fair comparison). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
The Disney Elements of The Black Cauldron
 
Well, at least it`s not fireflies :)
Due to it`s oppressively dark tone, many have labeled The Black Cauldron as a departure from Disney. But it`s still in the same fantasy realm as many of it`s predecessors. But Cauldron is still interesting enough for not being a musical, with no songs whatsoever. The first animated movie at Disney to be one. But what it has in common with some of Walt`s features is having a male youth as a protagonist, just like Peter Pan and The Sword in the Stone. And just like the former movie, also having Taran coming across as semi-arrogant and a brat at the beginning (who also has an understated arc of his own). Taran also has a female counterpart, who`s an actual Princess (who`s never been included among the official list of Princesses. Despite how she`s, to be fair, too young to be included). Who`s a blonde and a child (and yes, she was inspired by Princess Aurora from Sleeping Beauty). And sure, while there`s essentially a hint of romance, it`s never fully developed. 
Well, this is the fantasy verison
of Arranged :)
But at the end, Cauldron still have the typical Disney components, like talking animal sidekicks, folklore, magic and a villlain. And even fairies (like Pinocchio and Peter Pan), goons (like Sleeping Beauty) and witches (like Stone). And also a sidekick who makes his sacrifice (Gurgi, who`s often been labeled as annoying. Despite how I don`t find him to be the worst Disney sidekick, despite how it`s easy to see why he would get on people`s nerves. And who sounds remarkably enough like Gollum from Lord of the Rings). It`s Welsh setting makes it instantly comparable to Stone and even non-Disney followers like Quest for Camelot. And yes, Taran`s mission is somewhat reminiscent of Arthur`s. However, regarding the Disneyfication aspect of the story, it`s remarkable is how Disney`s version is mostly based on the first book, The Book of Three, from 1964 (which was a deliberate choice from Joe Hale). As for The Horned King, despite how he isn`t regarded as one of Disney`s greatest villains, is still cherished enough.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Behind the Scenes Information
 
I know that it`s rude to point, 
but my parents never taught 
me courtesy :)
Lenore Duckwall, wife of production manager Don Duckwall, had read the books and suggested an adaptation to her husband. Don showed the books to Wolfgang "Woolie" Reitherman, who agreed to adapt the series. As Disney`s animated pictures weren`t appealing to teenagers at that time, who were the bulk of the audience in theaters, They wanted to make a PG-rated picture that would attract an older audience. Disney showed interest in 1971 and got the rights to the books in 1973. And Disney were excited about it (as was Don Bluth), as the new generation thought it could be the next Snow White and the Seven Drawfs. But since the stories were so elaborate, the crew worked on it through the whole decade. Veteran artist Mel Shaw made preliminary pastel sketches, which Disney president Miller found too advanced for the new animators. And wanted them to hone their skills on less ambitious projects like Pete’s Dragon, The Small One, Hound and Mickey’s Christmas Carol. And as they weren`t able to animate realistic human characters, was the reason why it was set for a Christmas 1984 release and Hound took it`s place. 
Well, this is what happens 
when you`re a girl in a man`s
World :)
John Musker was the film's initial director and assigned to expand scenes in the first act, but they were too funny. When Hound had wrapped, directors Art Stevens, Richard Rich, Ted Berman, and Dave Michener became involved. But when too many people were involved, Miller decided Stevens was not appropriate to guide Cauldron. Joe Hale wanted it to have a different look, but still having a typical Disney style. Which made production start going in 1980. He threw character artwork by Tim Burton and Andreas Deja, and along with Rich and Berman, wanting a Sleeping Beauty visual approach. Milt Kahl was brought out of retirement to create designs for the characters. Both Musker and Ron Clements were removed from the project for the changes. The Horned King`s role was expanded to a villain of many characters of the books. 
These are the stages of 
evolution of darkness :)
But when production began, many felt that it was misguided. They found it too dark, without comedy. And therefore it lay in development and many lost faith in the movie. Jeffrey Katzenberg ordered scenes to be cut, which messed with it`s continuity. As those scenes, like the climax, were too disturbing to children at test screenings. Which delayed its release to 1985. Katzenberg thought it was possible to edit an animated movie. Eisner tried to stop him. But it was cut by twelve minutes, with some scenes rewritten and reanimated. While most scenes were seamlessly removed, the Cauldron-Born scene has some lapses because the removal made a jump in the film's soundtrack. For last minute revisions, much of Bernstein's score was cut. 
Don`t ask me what I`m 
looking into :)
And yes, according to both Eisner and Roy Disney it was the most complicated movie made, but they would`ve worry about the story. Some claim that Cauldron`s result was thanks to the lack of a clear directioral vision. But it was more successful outside North America, notably in Asia and France, where it was the fifth most viewed film that year. Disney wanted the Cauldron-Born sequence to have a holographic sequence that would bring the swordsmen to the theater. But it was scrapped for being too expensive. A 10-week animators' strike in 1982 delayed the movie even more. The director wanted to add songs to Cauldron, to reduce it`s darkness. Miller didn`t want the picture to run over 80 minutes. Disney wanted to market it as a comedy. Henn worked on Fflewddur, the minstrel, as well as some Gurgi. Gary Burghoff of M*A*S*H tried as Gurgi. He tried many voices, since Berman didn`t knew how he should sound. But he was thrown out of the studio. Hayley Mills was considered for Eilonwy. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Epilogue
 
My cute and innocent look is
deceiving :)

At the end, The Black Cauldron is essentially stuck with it`s semi dud-staple. And truth to be told, it would be fair to say that it will most likely never get past that staple. And therefore it`s really hard to even conclude it for that reason. But despite how it`s fanbase is questionable, it`s still nice that it has it`s small fanbase, after all. As for what I consider to be it`s strengths, I do find it to be engaging, charming and evocative, despite how it`s perhaps not the very best Disney has done. The animation, while not being the very best, is still good enough and the facial expressions are well done.  
We hate being stuffed. For 
obvious reasons. Duuuh :)
The score is good and the characters are fine enough. The story is straightforward enough, but still fine enough on it`s own terms. However, the gripes that I had with it is how the three witches were annoying and the same could be said about the comedy. But since this entry was meant to synergize with it`s 40th Anniversary (yes, it`s hard to believe that it`s been that long), there`s nothing left to wish The Black Cauldron Happy 40th Anniversary and may you continue to have many more.








 
 
 
References: 
Disney`s Art of Animation: From Mickey Mouse to Hercules (Bob Thomas) 
The Art of Walt Disney: From Mickey Mouse to the Magic Kingdoms (Christopher Finch)
Waking Sleeping Beauty 

onsdag 2. juli 2025

"How To Train a Dragon" - The Successful and Cherished Viking DreamWorks Animated Feature Who`s Now Receiving it`s Live Action Treatment

Hi folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! These entries are just meant to be my analyses. Not reviews or statements. Just fun analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies. 

Make sure to leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way, please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrect grammar may be notable.

And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of spoilers! And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny. So I hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize


With the release of the live action version of How to Train Your Dragon, it`s would be perfectly appropriate to talk about the predecessor who started the franchise...




Humans are friends, not food :)









During more than a decade, Disney have exploited most of their animated library and turned many of their animated properties into live action remakes. A corporate choice that has been mostly made for two reasons: For the pure sake of how Hollywood is essentially out of original ideas (yes, it`s true) and also for turning into profit. However, this trend who`s now lasted more than fifteen years has also turned out to be extremely lucrative, as it has turned most of these remakes into a profit (well, at least some of them). However, if there`s been another staple of the Disney remakes, is how they`re essentially made to improve and fix the errors of their animated predecessors (well, at least some of them). 
But regardless of that staple, there`s no denial how this trend is essentially a double edged sword, since even the mere thought of remaking a classic is essentially something that would irk purists. But Hollywood is essentially what Hollywood is: Rebooting classics for the sake of commercialism. But following the trend is DreamWorks and Universal Pictures, who`s essentially seen the lucrative market of remakes and have now turned one of their animated franchises into a live action property. And that is none other than How to Train Your Dragon
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

General Information About How to Train Your Dragon  
 


To take consideration to the remake, we`ll have to take consideration of the original. Released in March 2010 and
loosely based on the 2003 novel by Cressida Cowell, How to Train Your Dragon was directed by Chris Sanders and Dean DeBlois (Lilo & Stitch, who`s also received it`s live action remake), who co-wrote the screenplay. Produced by Bonnie Arnold (Tarzan, Toy Story) and Tim Johnson (AntzSinbad Legend of the Seven Seas). Staring Jay Baruchel, Gerard Butler, Craig Ferguson (Brave), America Ferrera, Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, T.J. Miller (his first voice acting job), and Kristen Wiig. John Powell (AntzKung Fu Panda) was the composer, his first gig alone. Kathy Altieri (AladdinThe Lion King) was the production designer. Kristof Serrand and Fabio Lignini (The Prince of Egypt) were among the animators.  
Thom Enriquez (The Little Mermaid,
Hercules ) and Todd Kurosawa (The Lion KingPocahontas) were among the story artist. James Baxter (Beauty and the Beast) and Kathy Zielinski (The Hunchback of Notre Dame were among the animators. Lorna Cook (Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron) also worked on it. The sound were from Skywalker Sound. Dave Metzger (Wish, Mufasa) was among the orchestrators. Technical Services was provided by Hewlett-Packard. And since Dragon was released at a time when 3D in Theaters was fairly new (right after Avatar was released), it was of course a gimmick to promote the movie. Both critically and commercially, Dragon was a success. Grossing $217,581,231 Domestically and $494,879,860 Worldwide. And it was the first of three animated releases for DreamWorks in 2010, before Shrek Forever After in May and Megamind in November.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
The Reception and Staple of How to Train Your Dragon
 
Regarding the reception of How to Train Your Dragon, the truth is that it`s essentially a good one. Whether it should be regarded as a milestone in animation, is another case. But it was a movie that received praise and made it`s impact. And has it`s fanbase. Arriving at a time where mainstream animation was slowly changing again and where the zingy, zappy and zany Shrek-formula with celebrity names that made most American, animated movies homogenous was slowly making it`s exit. 
So while Dragon wasn`t perhaps the movie that broke out of that formula, at least it still served as a departure from it. So it was somewhat a part of a new, more refined DreamWorks (despite how Kung Fu Panda was somewhat a part of that trend, too). Sure, Dragon has it`s snark and features a celebrity voice cast, but frankly, it doesn`t come as zany. But it was a deliberate choice to be less frantic and zany with it`s tone. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Story and The Trademarks
 
Yes, I`ll give ya a treat for not
wanting to eat me :)
The first How to Train Your Dragon was not essentially a premise that was credited with originality. In fact, it`s plot was pretty derivative and formulaic in the regard of being about a forbidden friendship between adversaries. And also a pet and an owner story (which makes it instantly comparable to Stitch). It`s also a story about a guy who wants to destroy the species of his adversaries at first, but learns to befriend it. It`s also portrays a stereotypical parent/child conflict, of a bigoted, stern parent and the child who wants to prove his father`s worth. But end up chosing the wrong path that his father has chosen for him. And a protagonist who`s a rookie and has to go on a mission. But it`s also a story about how the protagonist essentially learns to do the opposite as his herd. 
The orange color behind me is 
a symbol of my fire :)
But 
Dragon is also remarkable of having a human cast story, a rarity in DreamWorks at the time. But it`s also remarkable for having a Viking setting, something that`s been rarely seen in full-length animation. But for what it`s worth, it has many of the characters speak in Scottish (which makes it instantly comparable to Pixar`s Brave). And yes, it`s remarkable how the younger characters are the only ones who speak in standard American accents, as opposed to the older characters (which was a deliberate choice, to distinguish them). But Dragon also has a character loosing his foot and getting a disability. Which is a rarity in animation. But it was also a choice that resonated with the adults in test screenings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Behind the Scenes Information
 
Don`t get fooled, there are 
invisible people who lives 
here :)
In 2004, the book series came to DreamWorks Animation. Finishing Over the Hedge (2006), Arnold became interested in adapting them. Earlier versions of the film followed the novel closely, directed by Peter Hastings (Pinky and the Brain, Animaniacs), but DreamWorks decided that the story skewed too much to younger viewers, which could negatively impact it`s grossings. It was a small and personal story, without older characters and ambitious action. DreamWorks Animation co-president Bill Damaschke hired Chris Sanders to take over, who called DeBlois. Damaschke thought Sanders would be a good replacement for Hastings. Sanders didn`t knew about the story, but still had a good feeling about it. But was intrigued by the flying sequences and wanted to do a film with flying characters. What attracted DeBlois was a teenaged protagonist in a larger-than-life fantasy action-adventure. 
Unfortunately, this is the 
evolution of animation :) From
hand drawn to CGi :)
But the crew found out that the most resonant way was to tell a origin story about the conflict between the humans and dragons. Originally the dragons and humans were getting along and the kids collected dragon eggs and raised them to do tricks. But the screenwriters changed it, to give it peril. While the crew retained many of the characters and their voice actors, they changed the age of the leads. So Hiccup was aged up from a child and was the first DreamWorks animated feature where the lead was a teenager. Toothless grew from a small and cuddly pet to a formidable, flyable beast. And the early designs of the characters survived in cameos. The father/son story became more integral. And the story was made into an action-adventure genre. 
I didn`t have a huge ego to let
my animator show an 
unfinished sketches of me
where I`m looking imperfect :)
The dragons' designers made dragons that were comical and innovative compared to other dragon. Toothless combined many dragon traits in a black panther-inspired design, that had large ears and eyes to convey emotion better. The actors for the secondary characters recorded together for ad-libbing. America Ferrera was chosen for the warmth in her voice. The crew had just 12 months to remake their filmHow to Train Your Dragon was moved from November 2009 to March 2010, to not collide with Avatar and how many theaters at the time didn`t have 3D. But they worried that the movie would slip to 2011. Jeffrey Katzenberg was angry over Clash of the Titans being released in 3D at the time, preventing Dragon from being released. The hesitation Toothless shows during the "touch" scene was an animation error. But the directors still kept it. The Night Fury dragon species was going to be more wolf-like in appearance. A employee's computer screen saver of a black leopard inspired the crew to make Toothless feline. As for changes to the book, Hiccup is given a love interest. And Toothless is small and green and red. But Cowell approved that Toothless could be bigger. 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Franchise

Due to DreamWorks` policy of turning every movie to a franchise, it`s not strange that How to Train Your Dragon eventually became a franchise. There were some shorts released between the two first movies, Legend of the Boneknapper Dragon (2010), Book of Dragons (2011) and Gift of the Night Fury (2011). There was also a TV series released in between, DreamWorks Dragons, airing on Cartoon Network in September 2012. The first sequel was released How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014), where Hiccup meets up with his long lost mother Alka (Cate Blanchett) and his father dies. It was a success, grossing $177,002,924 Domestically and $621,537,519 Worldwide. Followed by the short Dawn of the Dragon Racers (2014). After the two seasons, DreamWorks Dragons was titled Dragons: Race to the Edge. Where the characters are older and served as a prequel to the second film, running from June 2015 to February 2018.  
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World (2019) was the second sequel, giving Toothless his own love interest and where both he and Hiccup gets their children. It grossed $160,945,505 Domestically and $539,987,993 WorldwideHow to Train Your Dragon: Homecoming and How to Train Your Dragon: Snoggletog Log (both 2019) were two shorts released afterwards. A second series, Dragons: Rescue Riders, aired on Netflix in 2019 and features a completely different cast and setting, but set in the same universe. A third series, Dragons: The Nine Realms, streamed on Hulu and Peacock in December 2021.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
The Live Action Remake
 
But as for the purpose of this entry, How to Train Your Dragon has now followed the Disney mold and been turned into a live action remake. Released by Universal Pictures and DreamWorks. Of course, to even remake Dragon to live action is questionable, since the movie is only fifteen years old. And how DreamWorks essentially have other and more successful films in their legacy that could be turned into live action, even their Hand Drawn pictures (since they were made to compete with Disney). What`s remarkable is how this remake is how was directed by DeBlois himself. But he deliberately wanted to direct it, for having creative control. And to have some things be better in live action. Gerard Butler reprised his role of Stoick. John Powell also returned as the composer. 

The story is essentially the same as it`s predecessorFilming began in January
2024 in Belfast, Northern Ireland and wrapped in May. Many scenes from the predecessors were re-created shot-for-shot in live-action. Puppets were used to have the actors act against as the dragonsAs for myself, did I like the remake? Yes, despite how it was even more of a carbon copy of it`s predecessor than most of the Disney remakes. Mason Thames as Hiccup certainly looked the part and did a fine job, as did the other young actors. However, a gripe that I had with it is how Toothless` cartoony design (which was very similar to his animated predecessor) looked a little out of place and therefore seemed misplaced with the humans. However, the critics have approved it and so-far it`s done well at the Box Office. And yes, there will be a sequel released two years from now on.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 


 
 

Epilogue
 
Since I`m (Astrid) the girl, I
needed to outshine the guy :)
Because of girl power :)
At the end, How to Train Your Dragon is a honorable entry into the field of animation and DreamWorks libraby of franchises. And it is one of DreamWorks more respected franchises. As for my personal opinion about the first movie, frankly I liked it, but I thought it was a good film, but not a great one. I didn`t mind the derivative story, but frankly, I found the character designs too generic and cartoony. And otherwise there was little to elevate this movie from good to great.  
I`m the Vawe dragon :) 
Which is better than breathing
fire :)
Which could be said about the score, the animation and the cinematography. As for the remake, it is a perfectly adequate remake, despite how it is a carbon copy and there`s little to differentiate it from it`s predecessor. But as for expecting DreamWorks and other animated studios to turn their previous animated properties into remakes, we`ll have to accept that Hollywood is what Hollywood is: Corporate and always rebooting movies or franchises, no matter. Still, while this entry was synergized to center around the remake, the truth is that Dragon also happens to have it`s 15th Anniversary this year. So therefore there`s nothing left than to wish Dragon Happy 15th Anniversary and may you continue to have many more.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Well, at least it`s faster than 
flying on a plane :)



 
 
 
 
 
References: