Hi
folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing
several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! Theseentriesare just meant tobe my
analyses. Notreviews or statements.Just fun
analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the
pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies.
Make sure to
leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you
think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way,
please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrectgrammar may be notable.
And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of
spoilers!And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny.So I
hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize
When The Little Mermaid
had it`s 30th Anniversary in 2019, it was marked with a special event: With an Broadcast Celebration where the movie is played and
actors performing it`s musical numbers live. True that Disney has usually milked
their beloved products into similar properties. But in no such way was entirely Broadcasted and delineated between it`s animated and live action parts. And it became a huge
success. With that notion and due to how Mermaid was the one who started the famous and influential Disney Renaissance, there was no surprise that Mermaid`s successor, Beauty and the Beast, would undergo this transition.
A rose only for me :) Ain`t I lucky? :)
As for the position of Beauty,
it needless to point out it`s placement inDisney history. It`s been
regarded as not only the Cornerstone of the Renaissance. But one of the
studios most beloved films ever. So therefore it was no surprise that Beauty was going to be cherished in a Broadcast Celebration in late 2022. Despite
that it`s been celebrated the year after it`s 30th Anniversary (most
likely due to the Pandemic, despite how the marketing has made it
clear that 2022 was the Anniversary of it`s well known Best
Picture nomination at the Oscar`s, after all).
General Information About Beauty and the Beast 30th Celebration
Of course comparisons to the Mermaid
Broadcast are inevitable. WhileBeauty followed the same pattern
of being a movie shown with live musical sequences, it still was more edited
with the animated sequences than Mermaid. But at least Beauty shows actual drawings in some of the numbers. However, the introductory scene with Maurice was
shown in an alternative storyboard version. Some scenes (like the
prologue, the wolves, Belle entering the castle) were acted out, instead of
showing their animated versions (especially the latter
scene, with new dialogue by Lumiere and Cogsworth. There`s even a new additional scene with them after Gaston). The Belle reprise has been added more length with new dancers, as well with Gaston. Beauty also shows some Behind-the-Scenes footage with the actors and creators. And some footage about it`s everlasting legacy.
The scenes with the mirrors are hybrids of animation and live footage.The transformation of the Beast is a hybrid of how the animated scene is shown on screen with the actors observingBe Our Guest has a new introduction to Mrs Potts. Also some unfinished animation is shown now and then.
There are many pauses with showing the pedals of the rose falling. The ending version of Beauty and the Beast is performed by Belle and the Beast (and even having H.E.R. with a guitar solo, despite how it could`ve been perceived as not fitting in, due to it`s setting. No offence to H.E.R.). In fact, while Beauty has been equally known for it`s Broadway version, it`s remarkable that how unlike Mermaid, the songs from the stage version wasn`t in the Broadcast version. Instead we got Evermore performed by the Beast (performed by Groban without a Beast suit, which truly makes it a full circle for him). Due to how the live action remake of Beauty has been perceived as inferior to it`s predecessor, it`s still astonishing to even have it.
Behind the Scenes Information
The mirror stands out in this room :) With purpose :)
So yeah, Beauty and the Beast 30th Celebration is
another way of Disney milking their beloved products. But at least
it`s an honorable way of milking their property. Cause it deserves to
be honored in such a way. As for myself, having seen it, I`ve actually liked it a lot. I liked that it was presented as an event and cherished it`s legacy with Behind the Scenes information and interviews. Despite how it`s pretty much what`s expected. But considering how
Disney has now transformed two of their beloved Renaissance properties into a
Broadcast convention, let`s wonder if the same will happen for their
next cornerstones of the Renaissance, like Aladdin and last, but not least The Lion King. Anyhow, we`ll have to welcome Beauty and the Beast 30th Celebration into the Disney family and cherish it for it`s honorable intention.
Hi
folks! Welcome to my My Own Personal Nerdy Disney and Animation Scrutinizing Analysis blog. A blog where I'm analyzing
several Disney films, Disney or Animation in general! Theseentriesare just meant tobe my
analyses. Notreviews or statements.Just fun
analyses! Though I'll make some personal remarks now and then, the content of these entries are meant to be depicted objectively. They're made for entertainment purpose only and the
pictures/clips are copyright Disney or other companies.
Make sure to
leave a comment if you like this site! And if there's something you
think could be improved, please let me know. But in a constructive way,
please. And just a note; I'm not a Native English writer, so my incorrectgrammar may be notable.
And finally; If you haven't seen the films, beware of
spoilers!And the funny lines aren't meant to be nothing than funny.So I
hope you won't find them offensive. If so, I apologize
With the recent release of Disenchanted,
it would be perfectly appropriate to write about it`s predecessor who
started it all and who`s having it`s 15th Anniversary this fall...
Yes, we exist :)
Yes, the color blue is the Enchanted color :)
This is how you`ll look as an old ogre :)
When Shrek was released in the Summer of 2001, it solidified two things in the movie industry: How CGI animation was meant to take over Hand Drawn animation and the mockery of fairy tales. While the latter issue existed prior to Shrek, at least it became a trend to have mockeries of them after Shrek. Just look at all the movies that came after Shrek who did it! And yes, many people considered Shrek`s mockery to be aspoof
of Disney`s properties. However, regarding how Disney have mocked their
fairy tale components, they`ve happened to do it priorly. But perhaps
really not in the same way as they did with 2007`s Enchanted. Who is essentially an remarkable oddity in the Disney canon.
Looking worried makes you less dimensional :)
If we`re going to place Enchanted (named for how Giselle enchants everyone she meets) in Disney`s Library,
it would`ve been awfully tempting to place it among the category of Live Action Movies who`s blended with Animation. However, while that
placement is somewhat fair, it`s still on the surface. After all, Enchanted is
rather a conscious delination of the two mediums: A movie that shows the different worlds and how animated
characters comes to live in our world. However, what makes Enchanted notable
is that it was made in a time where hand drawn isn`t as prominent anymore.
Which makes it more rare. But what also makes Enchanted truly
outstanding is (as aforementioned) how it`s a conscious spoof of the tradmarks and elements
of Disney`s Princess movies. But unlike the likes of Shrek, which opted for complete irreverence, Enchanted`s mockery is a more respectful one.
I made the castle behind me myself with my own bare hands :)
It featured songs by the
Renaissance Disney Tunesmith Alan Menken and his partner Stephen
Schwartz (Pocahontas, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Prince of Egypt), which got nominated at the Oscar`s. While it didn`t set the Box Office on fire, it still made a decent profit ($127,807,262 Domestically and$340,487,836 Worldwide.Enchanted was the first film to openat #1 at Thanksgiving in the 21st century. And criticially it did well, too. And in a time when Disney`s name was (unfortunately) becoming synonymous with Disney Channel properties (with primarily it`s two H`s: High School Musical and Hannah Montana) and Disney Animation was slowly beginning to recover from their failures of the early 2000`s (Brother Bear, Home on the Range and Chicken Little), at least Enchanted was a proof that Disney was slowly getting back on track.
We wanted to stand out from the pink behind us, so that`s why we`re in different colors :)
And since Enchanted was also released in a time when Disney`s Princess Franchise was at it`s peak, it was technically
the first of the new generation to feature a Princess (and making
Giselle the second of three Princesses to be strawberry blonde. Besides Cinderella and Anna). And technically Giselle could`ve been included in the franchise (despite how she`s not technically one), until it wasdiscovered that Adams would pay royalties. And paved way for the following Revival Princesses (and yes, it has many similar components to Tangled, who even managed to be a snarky spoof on it`s own:
Both are set in European kingdoms with a forest, have a fair heroine, a
brown haired love interest, a female villain with music by Menken).
Ever ever after makes you a human :)
Even Disney veteran Jodi Benson (Ariel) gets a significant role(and was originally going to be in just one scene), with cameos by Princess voices as Paige O`Hara (Belle) and Judy Kuhn (Pocahontas). Carrie Underwood provides the ending song Ever Ever After. Just like Brother Bear,
it provides a ratio change from fullscreen to Widescreen (despite how
this change of ratio happens during a scene). And sure, it`s easy to
label the whole premise of Enchanted as pure fluff, cause it is. But it`s still not a disadvantage, as Enchanted comes across as genuinely inspired. But unlike some of it`s predecessors who`s blended both mediums, Enchanted haven`t
truly been included among the canon list. So it is essentially an
outlier.
In fact, the two aforementioned components (hand drawn animation andparody) is what makes Enchanted remarkable.
But the former element is certainly an notable issue (which the crew were excited to about). After all, Enchanted was
released between the time where Disney had decided to leave hand drawn
animation (in 2004) and the brief time where it was revived
(The Princess and the Frog). However, it was still a proof of
how a movie that featured hand drawn could still make a profit in a world that had mostly abandoned it (unless you
count the success of Simpsons The Movie, who`s a rare exception to the rule).
We have the same eyes :)
But my main reason for seeing Enchanted
was for it's hand drawn segments. And yes, it was the main reason for Disney fans
to seek it out. But in that area, Enchanted
truly shines. Supervised by former Disney animator James Baxter (Belle,
Rafiki,
Quasimodo) who volunteered to do the work, they were on good hands. As
the animated sequences manages to authentically capture the old-school
feel of Disney animation. Despite how unfortunately full hand drawn
scenes are mostly at the opening, at least there are some scenes that
appears later on. While the animation may not be as glorious as Disney
very best (sorry animators), it`s still nice, delightful and elaborate to look at (Narissa
is impressively animated and designed).
I`m so proud of having made you :) Despite how you`ll look better with time :)
However, what makes Enchanted fascinating to analyze is it`s fairy tale spoof. But as aforementioned, unlike the likes of Shrek, Enchanted
is a loving homage to Disney's Legacy. Both to the
Renaissance films and Walt's films (and also to live action Disney films,as Old Yeller, The Shaggy Dog, Swiss Family Robinson, Bon Voyage!, and Savage Sam. Even Lady and the Tramp gets a shoutout). But
at least it takes advantage of it's premise clearly; To portray the
contrasting difference between Disney's animated world and the real
world. The idea of taking a
Disney Princess to the real is somewhat
corny, but also cute and funny. Some of the mockeries are very obvious and others less obvious.
We`re competing over who`s having the thickest hair :)
Of course the purpose of Enchanted's mockery is to be tongue-in-cheeck and bringing laughs. Therefore Enchanted is
filled with clever jokes, puns and writing to contrast these both worlds. While there are some hints
towards sexuality, they`re rarely overt or grotesque (Giselle
gazing at a naked statue and Morgan saying how guys are only
after one thing). Despite how some of them, frankly, are a little too tongue-in cheek (Giselle not knowing the term angry and the taste of food. And Edward not
knowing what the term thinking is).
As they`ve written and executed in a economic and understated, yet
satisfying and compelling way. Cause they truly fills their purpose of
showing the difference between an idealized world and a harsh world. And
frankly (in my opinion), it`s a pity that the rest of the contrast
never lived up to those two moments, as they were the most emotionally
resonant scenes. And frankly, the story could`ve needed that same kind
of resonance all the way through. Since it needed to have that contrast
and needed to have more of it.
However, regarding the arcs of the characters, it`s remarkably how there`s
an arc to everyone of them. But frankly it`s the secondary characters
who goes through the most compelling arcs (in my opinion). While it may
seem like fluffy, at least Phoebe and Ethan (the African-American couple
who`s Robert helping) learns to love each other again and not to sacrifice their good times for their bad times thanks to Giselle`s encountering. Even more satisfying is the arc of Nathaniel (modeled after the Huntsman in Snow White), Narissa`s
henchman. Who`s secretly crushing on her and does her bidding, but
learns to not sacrifice his self-esteem and self-worth at the expense of
his crush. In fact, Nathaniel is the character with the best arc, which
makes it a pity that the story wasn`t primarily centered around him.
The Flaws of the Development of the Love Quadrangle
It`s an interspecies romance :)
However, for all of it`s good intentions, unfortuntately Enchanted is hampered
by the cluttered development of it`s love quadrangle. But yeah, while
the quadrangle has it`s purpose, it feels superfluous and adds an
unnecessary element of a soap opera-angle to the movie. Most obvious is
certainly the sparse development of Robert and Giselle: Their
development is too rushed and contrived to be believable. Most of the
time Robert spends mentoring Giselle,
who`s out of her element and being mostly a mentor than a love
interest. However, while their brief argument is an arc for both of
them, they suddenly fall in love after it without question. Despite
having little chemistry as a couple.
Even guys can like glitter :)
The same contrivance comes with the switch of the triangle with Edward (who
James Mardsen had fun playing) and Nancy Tremaine (named after
Cinderella`s stepmother). Despite how they display more chemistry, their
arc and development is also too way too
rushed be believable (and yes, since Nancy marries Edward, it does play
the scrutiny of why Nancy isn`t a Official Disney Princess. But hey,
scrutiny will always come with such things who gets unexplained in our
scrutinizing world).
Disenchanted
I`m looking cool in a blue, Medieval suit, don`t I? :)
While 15 years have passed since the release of Enchanted, it`s simply remarkable that it`s taken so long to make a sequel to it. Which wassimply named Disenchanted.
What makes it even more remarkable is how unlike it`s predecessor, it`s
headed straight into streaming (Disney Plus). Most of the cast have
returned (with the exception of Sarandon and Rachel Covey who played
Morgan, who`s now been replaced by Gabriella Baldacchino. Which her favorite movie was Enchanted). Menken and Scwhartz returned as the songwriting team (with even more songs than it`s predecessor).
I`m a descendant from Beauty and the Beast :)
Even producers Barry Johnson and Barry Sonnenfeld were back (as well as Adams producing). And the hand drawn sequences are back (despite how the marketing made less fuzz about it this time. John Pomeroy (John Smith fromPocahontas) animated them). Directed now by Adam Shankman (Hairspray), who was Enchanted`s director in 2003. And yes, Lima was saddenedto not be asked. As for the plot, it takes place ten years after it`s
predecessor. And centers around having our friends move from New York
to Monroeville (with a new baby, Sophia) and having now a teenage Morgan
having to deal with her teenage angst and frustrations (and even gets a
mandatory love interest). Which has Giselle yearning for the simplicity
of Andalasia and having a spell which transforms Monroeville to an
Andalasian fairy tale. But also with disastrious consequences, by having
Giselle actually becoming an evil stepmother (Shankman
wasn’t afraid about this darkness, which he saw as a
natural evolution for the world).
I wanted to prove how two characters from each medium can interact without any wishing wand :)
There`s a new villain this time, Malvina (who happens to be the mother of Morgan`s love interest and people were afraid of her with her costume).
Robert gets his own storyline about his purpose. Even Pip is back in
both forms this time. And for those of you who`ve ranted about how
Menzel never sang in Enchanted, at least she gets to sing twice in the sequel (Love Power was inspired from Let It Go from Frozen and DefyingGravity from Wicked). And yes, there`s even more obvious references to past Disney Princess features in this movie. New actors among the cast are Yvette Nicole Brown (Lady & the Tramp 2019), Maya Rudolph and Kolton Stewart.
I`m hugging you to make you forget all the swirling around us :)
At the end, Enchanted may perhaps not be a milestone in Disney`s history.
But it`s still an honorary entry to Disney`s library of fairy tales.
Not only because of it`s tongue-in-cheek parody and the fact that it
brought hand drawn animation back again for a brief while. But because
it`s cute, clever and an honorary parody of Disney`s legacy. It`s hard
to believe that it`s been fifteen years since it`s release and it`s
remarkable that we`ve waited so long for the sequel to come.
I wanted to look like a beaver, but it was hard :)
As for myself, did I like Enchanted? Yes, despite
that it`s not the very best that Disney has ever done. It`s hampered by
some flaws: The live action Pip was really annoying, some of the
cartoony elements felt out of place in the real world, Enchanted
feels less inspired with it`s live action segments and Narissa goes from
being a menacing villain to become contrived and annoying at the
climax. Still, Enchanted is still redeeming despite it`s flaws
and is both inspired and honorable. But since it`s been fifteen years
since it`s release and now that we`ve seen it`s sequel fifteen years
later, there`s nothing left to wish Enchanted Happy 15th Anniversary and may you continue to have many more.